Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

472
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
472
Nodal Analysis01:10

Nodal Analysis

1.2K
Nodal analysis is a fundamental method in electrical engineering used to simplify the process of circuit analysis. This method revolves around the concept of using node voltages as the primary variables for circuit analysis. The objective is to determine the voltage at each node in a circuit, which can then be used to find other quantities of interest, such as currents through specific components.
Consider, for instance, a simple circuit composed of three nodes and three resistors, as shown in...
1.2K
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

141
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
141

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Participant Heterogeneity in the Prostate Cancer Biobank of the NRG: An Obstacle to Broadening the Reach of Precision Oncology.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Integrating Natural Language Processing With ChatGPT to Improve Quality of Artificial Intelligence Summaries of Prostate Cancer Consultations.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same author

Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals tumor-immune determinants of lymph node colonization and progression in thyroid cancer.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Clinical Validation of a Multiplex Urine Biomarker Assay for Surveillance of Recurrent Bladder Cancer.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Intismeran Autogene Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone in High-Risk Resected Melanoma: 5-Year Update of the Randomized Phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 Study.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Life expectancy estimation in older men using the prostate cancer comorbidity index in VA & SEER-Medicare cohorts.

Age and ageing·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K

Quantitative Nodal Burden and Mortality Across Solid Cancers.

Anthony T Nguyen1,2, Michael Luu2,3, Vina P Nguyen4

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|March 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) is a universal predictor of cancer survival across many solid tumors. This study found that higher LN counts consistently correlate with increased mortality risk, suggesting a standardized approach to nodal staging.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

218
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

400

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

218
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

400

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Nodal staging systems for solid tumors are inconsistent, suggesting variability in how lymph node (LN) status impacts outcomes.
  • This study challenges that notion, hypothesizing that the number of metastatic LNs is a universal predictor of patient outcomes across diverse cancer types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) is a dominant and universal predictor of mortality across various solid tumors.
  • To develop and validate novel nodal classification systems based on metastatic LN count.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of over 1.3 million patients from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) across 16 cancer types.
  • Multivariable Cox regression and Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) were used to model the association between metastatic LN count and mortality.
  • Validation in a separate cohort of nearly 2 million patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

Main Results:

  • Mortality risk consistently increased with a higher number of metastatic LNs across all analyzed cancer sites (P < .001).
  • RPA-derived nodal classification systems demonstrated improved prognostic accuracy compared to existing staging methods in certain cancers.
  • High quantitative nodal burden emerged as the strongest tumor-intrinsic predictor of mortality in 12 out of 16 cancer types.

Conclusions:

  • The quantitative burden of metastatic lymph nodes is a fundamental factor driving mortality in solid cancers.
  • Pathologic nodal staging for solid tumors should be based on the number of metastatic LNs for improved accuracy and consistency.