Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex-stratified insights into the genetics of brain volumes in late adulthood.

Biology of sex differences·2026
Same author

The neuroanatomy of depression: weak but replicable effects in 4021 individuals from three clinical cohorts.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Brain Aging in Specific Phobia: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Decomposing neuroanatomical heterogeneity in depression: insights from an ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group study in 5146 individuals.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

The role of metabolic health in neurostructural and cognitive alterations in bipolar disorders.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Mediation Analysis Between Brain Age, Disease-Modifying Factors, and Disability and Cognitive Performance in Multiple Sclerosis.

Neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
10:13

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach

Published on: February 14, 2014

13.8K

Mind the gap: Performance metric evaluation in brain-age prediction.

Ann-Marie G de Lange1,2,3, Melis Anatürk3,4, Jaroslav Rokicki5,6

  • 1LREN, Centre for Research in Neurosciences, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne.

Human Brain Mapping
|March 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Estimating brain age using neuroimaging is promising, but performance metrics vary significantly. Study design factors like age range and sample size impact accuracy, necessitating careful interpretation of results for reliable brain health markers.

Keywords:
brain-age predictionmachine learningneuroimagingstatistics

More Related Videos

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.6K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
10:13

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach

Published on: February 14, 2014

13.8K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.6K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Neuroimaging-derived data is increasingly used for estimating brain age and assessing brain health.
  • Machine learning models can predict age from brain characteristics, but reported accuracy varies widely across studies.
  • Standard performance metrics for these models include Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), R-squared, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how factors like age range, sample size, and age-bias correction affect the performance metrics of age prediction models.
  • To assess the reliability and comparability of different performance metrics across various study conditions.
  • To provide guidance on interpreting model performance for accurate brain age estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Age prediction was performed on two population-based neuroimaging datasets.
  • The impact of varying age ranges and sample sizes on model performance was evaluated.
  • The influence of age-bias correction on standard performance metrics (r, R², RMSE, MAE) was assessed.

Main Results:

  • Performance metrics (r, R²) were lower in datasets with narrower age ranges.
  • RMSE and MAE were also lower in narrower age ranges due to predictions clustering around the mean age.
  • Model performance metrics improved with larger sample sizes across different age ranges.
  • Age-bias corrected metrics indicated high accuracy even for models with initially poor performance, highlighting the importance of prediction variance.

Conclusions:

  • Performance metrics for neuroimaging-based age prediction models are highly dependent on cohort and study-specific data characteristics.
  • Direct comparison of performance metrics across different studies is not reliable due to variations in methodology and data.
  • While age-bias corrected metrics suggest high accuracy, examining uncorrected metrics is crucial for understanding model attributes like prediction variance.