Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
Published on: November 9, 2011
MCDAL: Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Active Learning
Abstract:
Recent state-of-the-art active learning methods have mostly leveraged generative adversarial networks (GANs) for sample acquisition; however, GAN is usually known to suffer from instability and sensitivity to hyperparameters. In contrast to these methods, in this article, we propose a novel active learning framework that we call Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Active Learning (MCDAL) that takes the prediction discrepancies between multiple classifiers. In particular, we utilize two auxiliary classification layers that learn tighter decision boundaries by maximizing the discrepancies among them. Intuitively, the discrepancies in the auxiliary classification layers' predictions indicate the uncertainty in the prediction. In this regard, we propose a novel method to leverage the classifier discrepancies for the acquisition function for active learning. We also provide an interpretation of our idea in relation to existing GAN-based active learning methods and domain adaptation frameworks. Moreover, we empirically demonstrate the utility of our approach where the performance of our approach exceeds the state-of-the-art methods on several image classification and semantic segmentation datasets in active learning setups.
Related Concept Videos
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Classification of Systems-II
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Improving Translational Accuracy
