Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

1.3K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
1.3K
Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model01:20

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

6.1K
The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...
6.1K
Drug Nomenclature01:17

Drug Nomenclature

2.4K
During the development of a new pharmaceutical, the manufacturer initially assigns a code name to the drug. Once approved, the drug receives a United States Adopted Name (USAN)—a generic, nonproprietary designation. Upon being listed in the United States Pharmacopeia, this nonproprietary name becomes the drug's official name. Additionally, the manufacturer assigns a proprietary name or trademark, which serves as the brand name under which the drug is marketed. It is worth noting that...
2.4K
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

137
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
137
Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview01:05

Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview

265
Multicompartmental models are crucial tools in pharmacokinetics, providing a framework to understand how drugs move within the body. The two-compartment model is a crucial subtype, segmenting the body into central and peripheral compartments. The central compartment represents areas with high blood flow, such as plasma and highly perfused organs like the kidneys and liver, while the peripheral compartment signifies tissues with lower blood flow, like adipose tissue and muscle tissue.
The...
265
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

237
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
237

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competition matters: Uniform vs. indication-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same author

Taking the competitor's pill: When combination therapies enter pharmaceutical markets.

Journal of health economics·2025
Same author

Hospital competition when patients learn through experience.

Journal of health economics·2024
Same author

Competition, quality and integrated health care.

Journal of health economics·2024
Same author

The price of cost-effectiveness thresholds under therapeutic competition in pharmaceutical markets.

Journal of health economics·2023
Same author

Investment and quality competition in healthcare markets.

Journal of health economics·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

17.9K

Paying for pharmaceuticals: uniform pricing versus two-part tariffs.

Kurt R Brekke1, Dag Morten Dalen2, Odd Rune Straume3

  • 1Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), Department of Economics, Centre for Business Economics, Helleveien 30, Bergen N-5045, Norway.

Journal of Health Economics
|March 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Two-part pricing for pharmaceuticals can benefit health plans with competition but may harm them under monopoly. Payment schemes also affect innovation incentives.

Keywords:
Health plansPayment schemesPharmaceuticals

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Drug Sorption to PVC- and Non-PVC-based Tubes in Administration Sets Using a Pump
06:08

Evaluation of Drug Sorption to PVC- and Non-PVC-based Tubes in Administration Sets Using a Pump

Published on: March 11, 2017

10.8K
Formation of Dispersible Taohong Siwu Tablets
05:44

Formation of Dispersible Taohong Siwu Tablets

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

17.9K
Evaluation of Drug Sorption to PVC- and Non-PVC-based Tubes in Administration Sets Using a Pump
06:08

Evaluation of Drug Sorption to PVC- and Non-PVC-based Tubes in Administration Sets Using a Pump

Published on: March 11, 2017

10.8K
Formation of Dispersible Taohong Siwu Tablets
05:44

Formation of Dispersible Taohong Siwu Tablets

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Pharmaceutical pricing strategies
  • Market competition analysis

Background:

  • Traditional uniform pricing for pharmaceuticals is being challenged by two-part pricing models.
  • Two-part pricing involves a fixed access fee and unit prices at marginal cost.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of two-part pricing versus uniform pricing on health plans and pharmaceutical innovation.
  • To compare outcomes under different market structures (monopoly vs. competition) and contract types (exclusive contracts).

Main Methods:

  • Economic modeling of pharmaceutical markets.
  • Analysis of health plan and producer surplus under various pricing schemes.
  • Evaluation of incentives for different types of innovation.

Main Results:

  • Two-part pricing is socially efficient but can disadvantage health plans under monopoly by extracting all surplus.
  • With competition, two-part pricing improves patient utility and reduces health plan costs.
  • Uniform pricing is preferred by health plans when exclusive contracts are present.
  • Pricing schemes influence the balance between drastic and incremental pharmaceutical innovations.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of pharmaceutical pricing model significantly impacts market efficiency, cost, and innovation.
  • Two-part pricing offers advantages in competitive markets but requires careful consideration in monopolistic settings and with exclusive contracts.