Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Young peoples' involvement in welfare service development-Is voice enough?-A thematic synthesis of qualitative
Line Nortvedt1, Cecilie F Olsen2, Hege Sjølie1,3
1Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Background:
Young people need to be heard and take an active role in developing welfare services. When they are recognized as having skills and expertize, the advantages young people's involvement brings to both themselves and the organizations, are mobilization and empowering with impact on national decision-making.
Objective:
To synthesize existing literature on how young people's involvement in coproduction can contribute to better welfare services.
Search Strategy:
We performed a systematic literature search in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cinahl).
Inclusion Criteria:
Publications whose abstracts contained themes as: Young people 12-25 years of age, receiving welfare, youth coproduction/involvement/participation and qualitative studies.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Of the 5469 documents retrieved, the full text of 58 studies was read, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria. A thematic synthesis following Thomas and Harden was used.
Main Results:
Young people being involved in coproduction of developing welfare services experienced to be valued and supported by partnerships, but they also pointed out deficiencies in welfare services. Some of the adolescents expressed not being listened to, lack of trusted relations and not being involved in policy making or prospects. The staff members saw some challenges with partnering with youth; as the need for flexibility, to keep the youth engaged and to purposefully meet the adolescents where they need help, guidance or resources.
Conclusions:
More involvement should be stressed. Coproduction is often symbolic more than resulting in real changes in the welfare services. Consequently, what is crucial when young people are involved is that they are encouraged by adults to be clear about the degree of involvement they want.
Patient Or Public Contribution:
Patient and public involvement was not explicit in this review.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Nursing Evaluation