Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Discovery of Metastatic Regulators using a Rapid and Quantitative Intravital Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model
Published on: February 3, 2021
A Cell Double-Barcoding System for Quantitative Evaluation of Primary Tumors and Metastasis in Animals That Uncovers
Arkadi Hesin1, Santosh Kumar1, Valid Gahramanov1
1Department of Molecular Biology, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Abstract:
Imaging in monitoring metastasis in mouse models has low sensitivity and is not quantitative. Cell DNA barcoding, demonstrating high sensitivity and resolution, allows monitoring effects of drugs on the number of tumor and metastatic clones. However, this technology is not suitable for comparison of sizes of metastatic clones in different animals, for example, drug treated and untreated, due to high biological and technical variability upon tumor and metastatic growth and isolation of barcodes from tissue DNA. However, both numbers of clones and their sizes are critical parameters for analysis of drug effects. Here we developed a modification of the barcoding approach for monitoring drug effects on tumors and metastasis that is quantitative, highly sensitive and highly reproducible. This novel cell double-barcoding system allows simultaneously following the fate of two or more cell variants or cell lines in xenograft models in vivo, and also following the fates of individual clones within each of these populations. This system allows comparing effects of drugs on different cell populations and thus normalizing drug effects by drug-resistant lines, which corrects for both biological and technical variabilities and significantly increases the reproducibility of results. Using this barcoding system, we uncovered that effects of a novel DYRK1B kinase inhibitor FX9847 on primary tumors and metastasis is clone-dependent, while a distinct drug osimertinib demonstrated clone-independent effects on cancer cell populations. Overall, a cell double-barcoding approach can significantly enrich our understanding of drug effects in basic research and preclinical studies.
Insights
A new double-barcoding method enhances cancer drug studies by quantifying tumor and metastasis clone sizes in mouse models. This approach improves reproducibility and reveals clone-dependent drug effects, advancing preclinical research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Current imaging methods for metastasis in mouse models lack sensitivity and quantitative accuracy.
- Cell DNA barcoding offers high sensitivity for monitoring tumor and metastatic clones but struggles with comparing clone sizes due to variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a quantitative, sensitive, and reproducible method for monitoring drug effects on tumor and metastatic clones.
- To enable comparison of metastatic clone sizes across different experimental groups, correcting for biological and technical variability.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel cell double-barcoding system for in vivo xenograft models.
- Enabled simultaneous tracking of multiple cell variants and individual clones within populations.
- Normalized drug effects by comparing drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cell lines.
Main Results:
- The double-barcoding system demonstrated high sensitivity, quantitation, and reproducibility.
- Revealed clone-dependent effects of the DYRK1B kinase inhibitor FX9847 on primary tumors and metastasis.
- Showed clone-independent effects of osimertinib on cancer cell populations.
Conclusions:
- The cell double-barcoding approach significantly enhances the understanding of drug effects in basic and preclinical cancer research.
- This method improves the accuracy and reproducibility of analyzing drug efficacy on tumor and metastatic clones.
More Related Videos
08:18Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples
Published on: April 7, 2023
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020