Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Utilizing Murine Inducible Telomerase Alleles in the Studies of Tissue Degeneration/Regeneration and Cancer
Published on: April 13, 2015
CDK6 Degradation Is Counteracted by p16INK4A and p18INK4C in AML
Belinda S Schmalzbauer1, Teresemary Thondanpallil1, Gerwin Heller2
1Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) represents a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of certain subtypes of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). CDK4/6 kinase inhibitors have been widely studied in many cancer types and their effects may be limited by primary and secondary resistance mechanisms. CDK4/6 degraders, which eliminate kinase-dependent and kinase-independent effects, have been suggested as an alternative therapeutic option. We show that the efficacy of the CDK6-specific protein degrader BSJ-03-123 varies among AML subtypes and depends on the low expression of the INK4 proteins p16INK4A and p18INK4C. INK4 protein levels are significantly elevated in KMT2A-MLLT3+ cells compared to RUNX1-RUNX1T1+ cells, contributing to the different CDK6 degradation efficacy. We demonstrate that CDK6 complexes containing p16INK4A or p18INK4C are protected from BSJ-mediated degradation and that INK4 levels define the proliferative response to CDK6 degradation. These findings define INK4 proteins as predictive markers for CDK6 degradation-targeted therapies in AML.
Insights
Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) degraders show variable efficacy in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) subtypes. INK4 protein levels (p16INK4A, p18INK4C) predict response, acting as biomarkers for targeted therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) is a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).
- CDK4/6 inhibitors face resistance; CDK4/6 degraders offer an alternative by eliminating kinase-dependent and -independent effects.
- The efficacy of CDK6 degraders in AML subtypes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of the CDK6-specific protein degrader BSJ-03-123 in different AML subtypes.
- To identify factors influencing the response to CDK6 degradation therapy in AML.
- To establish INK4 proteins as predictive biomarkers for CDK6 degradation-targeted therapies.
Main Methods:
- Assessed the efficacy of BSJ-03-123 across various AML subtypes.
- Measured INK4 protein levels (p16INK4A, p18INK4C) in different AML subtypes.
- Investigated the interaction between INK4 proteins and CDK6 complexes in response to BSJ-03-123.
Main Results:
- BSJ-03-123 efficacy varied among AML subtypes, correlating with low INK4 protein expression.
- INK4 protein levels were significantly higher in KMT2A-MLLT3+ AML cells than in RUNX1-RUNX1T1+ cells.
- CDK6 complexes with p16INK4A or p18INK4C were protected from BSJ-mediated degradation, influencing the proliferative response.
Conclusions:
- INK4 protein levels are critical determinants of CDK6 degrader efficacy in AML.
- INK4 proteins serve as predictive biomarkers for response to CDK6 degradation therapies in AML.
- Targeting CDK6 degradation offers a promising therapeutic strategy for specific AML subtypes based on INK4 expression.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Abnormal Proliferation
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Anaphase Promoting Complex
Positive Regulator Molecules

