Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

40.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
40.2K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.6K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

22
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
22
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

92.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
92.0K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

573
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
573

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping factors influencing the success of group activities for persons with dementia through the comprehensive process model of group engagement.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Enhanced group activity kits for persons living with dementia: a qualitative analysis of outcomes and mechanisms of action.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Evaluating the feasibility and perceived benefits of enhanced group activity kits for engaging persons living with dementia at home: A pilot study.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2025
Same author

End-of-Life Health Costs Were Predicted Primarily by Prior Health Costs, and Secondarily by Temporal, Health and Demographic Factors.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2025
Same author

Response to Dr. Ouslander's Editorial on Antipsychotic Use in Nursing Home Residents.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025
Same author

Communications Needs of Family Caregivers of Geriatric Unit Residents at End-of-Life.

The Gerontologist·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K

Motivation to Participate in Intergenerational Programs: A Comparison across Different Program Types and Generations.

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield1,2,3,4

  • 1Minerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|March 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Understanding motivations in intergenerational programs (IGPs) is key. Findings reveal differing motivators for older and younger adults, with relationships and enjoyment driving ongoing participation in these beneficial programs.

Keywords:
community-based programsintergenerational program evaluationintergenerational programsintergenerational relationsmotivationolder adultsyoung adults

More Related Videos

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K
A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
14:13

A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Published on: March 7, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K
A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
14:13

A Training Program Using an Agility Ladder for Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Published on: March 7, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social Gerontology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Community Engagement

Background:

  • Intergenerational programs (IGPs) show benefits for both older and younger individuals.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding participant motivations for joining and continuing in IGPs.
  • Exploring generational differences in motivational factors is crucial for program development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the primary motivators for participation and perseverance in intergenerational programs.
  • To compare motivational differences between older and younger participants across various IGP types.
  • To identify factors influencing initial versus ongoing engagement in IGPs.

Main Methods:

  • Structured interviews conducted with 83 older adults (mean age=77) and 96 young adults (mean age=23).
  • Participants were involved in 13 distinct IGPs in Israel, varying in focus (topic-specific vs. assistance-based).
  • A mixed-methods approach analyzed motivational differences by age, program type, and stage of participation.

Main Results:

  • Older adults in topic-focused IGPs were motivated by subject interest; those in assistance groups sought support.
  • Younger participants were primarily motivated by obligation (e.g., scholarships) and a desire to help.
  • Positive intergenerational relationships and enjoyment were key drivers for sustained participation across age groups.

Conclusions:

  • Tailoring topic-focused activities can enhance older adult engagement in IGPs.
  • Expanding IGP settings and emphasizing altruistic opportunities can boost young adult participation.
  • Fostering positive relationships is essential for long-term success and participant retention in IGPs.