Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in Congenital Heart Disease
Published on: July 18, 2014
Sudden Cardiac Death Risk over Time in HCM Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Mariusz Klopotowski1, Krzysztof Kukula1, Jacek Jamiolkowski2
1Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Cardinal Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Insights
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is generally stable or decreases over time. Re-evaluating risk is crucial when considering ICD re-implantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) warrant implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) consideration.
- Current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines suggest SCD risk in HCM is not static.
- The study addresses the dynamic nature of SCD risk in HCM patients over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate changes in calculated 5-year SCD risk in HCM patients previously implanted with an ICD.
- To compare SCD risk between HCM patients undergoing first-time ICD implantation versus ICD re-implantation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 64 HCM patients with prior ICDs (re-implantation group) and 32 HCM patients receiving a first-time ICD.
- Assessment of 5-year SCD risk using the ESC risk calculator for eligible patients.
- Comparison of risk profiles between the two patient groups.
Main Results:
- The first-time ICD implantation group exhibited a higher 5-year SCD risk (7.50 IQR 5.98–10.46) compared to the re-implantation group (4.88 IQR 3.42–7.25).
- Among patients initially below 4% risk, 22% saw an increase, while 78% remained stable.
- Of those initially at or above 6% risk, 31% experienced a decrease to below 6%, with 14% dropping below 4%.
Conclusions:
- SCD risk in HCM patients typically remains stable or decreases.
- Periodic risk re-evaluation is essential, particularly when considering ICD re-implantation in HCM patients.
- These findings underscore the need for dynamic risk assessment in managing HCM patients with ICDs.
Abstract:
Background: In patients with HCM at high risk of SCD, an ICD should be considered as a standard of care. Current risk approximation algorithms recommended by ESC 2014 criteria indicate that SCD risk is not stable. The aim of the study was to investigate how the calculated SCD risk in HCM patients with an ICD implanted in the past changed over time. Methods: We analyzed 64 HCM patients with ICD for primary prevention, referred for ICD re-implantation, and 32 HCM patients referred for a first-time ICD placement during the same period. The 5-year-SCD risk was assessed for suitable patients using the recommended ESC calculator. Results: The first-time group had a higher 5-year-SCD risk than those referred for ICD re-implantation: 7.50 (IQR 5.98−10.46) vs. 4.88 (IQR 3.42−7.25), p < 0.05. Out of the patients with an initial calculated risk below 4%, the risk increased in 22% of cases, reaching the 4−6% range. In 78% of patients, the risk remained stable and low. In 31% of patients with an initial calculated SCD risk ≥ 6%, the risk decreased over time to below 6%, and in 14% of the cases, below 4%. Conclusions: SCD risk in HCM patients is usually stable or gets lower. Our data suggest it is important to re-evaluate the risk profile for patients with HCM when ICD re-implantation is considered.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...

