Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
Functional Remodeling Associated With Language Recovery After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic
Bing-Fong Lin1, Shih-Ching Yeh2, Yu-Chieh Jill Kao1
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background:
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising efficacy in improving the language functions in poststroke aphasia. However, randomized controlled trials were lacking to investigate the rTMS-related neuroimaging changes underlying the therapeutic effects on language improvement in chronic aphasia.
Objective:
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) on chronic poststroke aphasia. We hypothesized that the deactivation of the right pars triangularis could restore the balance of interhemispheric inhibition and, hence, facilitated the functional remodeling of language networks in both the hemispheres. Furthermore, the rTMS-induced functional reorganization should underpin the language recovery after rTMS.
Methods:
A total of 33 patients (22 males; age: 58.70 ± 13.77 years) with chronic stroke in the left hemisphere and nonfluent aphasia were recruited in this randomized double-blinded study. The ratio of randomization between the rTMS and sham groups is 17:16. All the patients received real 1-Hz rTMS or sham stimulation (placebo coil delivered < 5% of magnetic output with similar audible click-on discharge) at the right posterior pars triangularis for 10 consecutive weekdays (stroke onset to the first stimulation: 10.97 ± 10.35 months). Functional connectivity of language networks measured by resting-state fMRI was calculated and correlated to the scores of the Concise Chinese Aphasia Test by using the stepwise regression analysis.
Results:
After LF-rTMS intervention, significant improvement in language functions in terms of comprehension and expression abilities was observed compared with the sham group. The rTMS group showed a significant decrease of coupling strength between right pars triangularis and pars opercularis with a strengthened connection between right pars orbitalis and angular gyrus. Furthermore, the LF-rTMS significantly enhanced the coupling strength associated with left Wernicke area. Results of regression analysis showed that the identified functional remodeling involving both the hemispheres could support and predict the language recovery after LF-rTMS treatment.
Conclusion:
We reported the therapeutic effects of LF-rTMS and corresponding functional remodeling in chronic poststroke aphasia. Our results provided neuroimage evidence reflecting the rebalance of interhemispheric inhibition induced by LF-rTMS, which could facilitate future research in the refinement of rTMS protocol to optimize the neuromodulation efficacy and benefit the clinical management of patients with stroke.
