Comparative study of conventional ROI-based and volumetric histogram analysis derived from CT enhancement in...

To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional region of interest (ROI)-based and volumetric histogram analysis derived from CT enhancement in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.

A total of 230 patients with pathologically confirmed renal tumors who had undergone CT enhancement were classified into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (n = 133), non-ccRCC (n = 56), and benign renal tumor(n = 41) group. Parametric CT enhancement of each tumor from volumetric histogram were obtained using in-house software, including 10th percentile, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, 90th percentile, mean, standard deviation, as well as skewness, kurtosis and entropy, and histogram metrics among these groups were analyzed. ROI-based enhancement density was also analyzed.

The entropy and SD values of ccRCCs were higher than those of non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors (p < 0.05). The 10th percentile, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, 90th percentile and mean values of ccRCCs were lower than those of benign renal tumors, however, higher than those of non-ccRCCs (p < 0.05). The ROI-based enhancement density of non-ccRCCs were lower than those of ccRCCs and benign renal tumors(p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that entropy and mean values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs/non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors. ROC curve analyses showed that mean values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs and non-ccRCCs. In terms of pairwise comparisons of ROC curves and diagnostic efficacy, ROI-based CT enhancement density was worse than volumetric histogram analysis (p < 0.05).

Volumetric histogram analysis parameters can effectively distinguish malignant and benign renal tumors.

1. Entropy and mean values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs/ non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors.2. Mean values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs and non-ccRCCs.3.Volumetric histogram analysis had better performance than ROI-based enhancement density.