Human Co-Infections between Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Other Ixodes-Borne Microorganisms: A Systematic Review

Pierre H Boyer1, Cédric Lenormand1,2, Benoît Jaulhac1,3

  • 1Institut de Bactériologie, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, UR7290, ITI InnoVec, 3 Rue Koeberlé, F-67000 Strasbourg, France.

Insights

Tick-borne co-infections, including Lyme borreliosis (LB) and other tick-borne diseases, are complex. This review found co-disease occurred in specific clinical scenarios but had no evident impact on severity.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Tick-borne diseases are a significant public health concern.
  • Co-infections, the simultaneous presence of multiple pathogens, can complicate diagnosis and treatment.
  • Understanding co-infections between Lyme borreliosis and other tick-borne agents is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review co-infections between Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi s.l.) and other tick-borne microorganisms.
  • To analyze the frequency and clinical presentation of co-infections and co-disease.
  • To assess the impact of co-infections on disease severity.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of articles reporting co-infections with B. burgdorferi s.l.
  • Inclusion of 68 articles detailing 655 cases of potential co-infections.
  • Analysis of clinical manifestations and serological findings.

Main Results:

  • Most reported co-infections involved seropositivity for one agent alongside a diagnosed tick-borne disease.
  • Co-disease (simultaneous clinical expression) was observed, particularly with fever/erythema migrans or neurological symptoms (TBEv, neuroborreliosis).
  • No significant impact on disease severity was identified in the reviewed cases.

Conclusions:

  • Co-infections with Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and other tick-borne pathogens occur, with co-disease presenting in specific clinical contexts.
  • Further research is necessary to fully elucidate the prevalence and clinical significance of these co-infections.
  • Current evidence does not support increased disease severity due to co-infection.