Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
Complications After Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Effect of Surgeon Experience, Procedure Volume, and Other
Keren Guiab1, Teresa Evans1, William Brigode1
1John H. Stroger, 25430Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background:
Previous studies have examined how factors such as gender, education, type of training (MD or DO), and experience of the treating surgeon affect patient outcomes. We investigated patient complications after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgeon characteristics.
Methods:
A Medicare database was used to identify surgeon-specific data. The main outcome measure was the adjusted complication rates (ACR) for individual surgeons as reported by the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard. Surgeon gender, type of training, medical school rank, years since graduation, procedure volume, and teaching status of the primary hospital affiliation were assessed for any association with increased ACR using logistic regression analysis. We explored the associations among procedure volume, years of experience, and ACR using Spearman correlation.
Results:
1107 predominantly male (94.6%) surgeons were included. 94.4% were MDs and 34.5% were affiliated with teaching hospitals. Mean length of practice was 24 ± 9 years, and median surgeon procedure volume was 28 (IQR = 23, 37). Overall median ACR was 4.3%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgeon gender (P = .71), medical school rank, type of training (P = .68), or hospital affiliation (P = .77) did not have a significant impact on ACR. Increased surgeons' years in practice (r = -.028, P = .35) and increased surgeon procedure volume (r = -.021, P = .49) were negatively associated with increased ACR.
Conclusion:
Surgeon gender, type of training, medical school rank, or hospital affiliation had no impact on complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon experience and procedure volume may have clinical implications for patient outcomes. Further studies to elucidate factors associated with surgeon quality and patient outcomes are necessary.
