Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Impact of orthodontic brackets on intraoral and extraoral scans
Eduardo Otero Amaral Vargas1, Daniel Otero Amaral Vargas2, Raildo da Silva Coqueiro3
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Introduction:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of orthodontic brackets influences the accuracy of digital models generated by intraoral and extraoral scanning from the same patients.
Methods:
Eighteen orthodontic patients in permanent dentition underwent full-arch intraoral scanning with a CEREC Omnicam scanner (Dentsply Sirona, York, Pa). Alginate impressions from each patient's arch were taken, and plaster models were made and scanned. Intermolar, intercanine, and mesiodistal width of the incisors were measured on 2 digital and 1 plaster models. Analysis of variance or Friedman's test was used, with differences between pairs verified by the Bonferroni test or Wilcoxon test, respectively. Both digital models were superimposed using surface-based registration.
Results:
Lin's lowest coefficient of agreement was 0.960 (95% confidence interval, 0.900-0.984), which was clinically adequate. No statistically significant differences between the 3 types of model measurements were observed, except for the mandibular left lateral incisor in which scanned intraoral digital models presented Δmedium of 0.05 mm, which was higher than the plaster model. The superimposition of the extraoral and intraoral digital models revealed a minimum difference between models with a mean of means of 0.12 ± 0.03 mm.
Conclusions:
Brackets bonded to teeth affected intraoral scanning; however, the intraoral digital models are clinically comparable and present fewer distortions than plaster models. Moreover, measurements on intraoral and extraoral digital models are excellent in terms of trueness and precision and can be used clinically and in plaster models.

