Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Clinical characteristics, predictors, and outcomes of heart failure with improved ejection fraction
Kangkang Su1, Mingquan Li2, Lili Wang3
1Graduate School of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei 075000, China.
Insights
Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is a distinct phenotype with better outcomes than HFpEF and HFrEF. However, valvular heart disease and anemia worsen prognosis in HFimpEF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) can improve over time.
- Understanding the characteristics and prognosis of patients with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HFimpEF against other heart failure phenotypes.
- To identify factors influencing prognosis in HFimpEF.
Main Methods:
- Classified 561 heart failure patients into four groups based on LVEF: HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF, and HFimpEF.
- Assessed the composite endpoint of HF readmission and all-cause mortality, and all-cause mortality as secondary endpoint.
Main Results:
- HFimpEF patients demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of the composite endpoint and all-cause mortality compared to other groups.
- Beta-blockers and aldosterone receptor antagonists were associated with improved LVEF.
- Valvular heart disease and anemia were identified as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in HFimpEF.
Conclusions:
- HFimpEF represents an independent heart failure phenotype with a favorable prognosis, comparable to HFmrEF and superior to HFpEF and HFrEF.
- Co-existing valvular heart disease and anemia significantly increase adverse event rates in HFimpEF patients.
Aims:
Improvement in ejection fraction (EF) was observed in a subset of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We analyzed and compared these patients with other HF phenotypes.
Methods:
Based on left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) at baseline and follow-up, the 561 HF patients were divided into 4 groups: HF preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥ 50% on both occasions, n = 258), HF mid-range EF (HFmrEF, fluctuating between LVEF 40 and 49% on both occasions, n = 61), HFrEF (LVEF < 40% on both occasions, n = 141), and HF improved EF (HFimpEF, defined as LVEF < 40% at baseline and LVEF ≥ 40% at follow-up with ≥10% absolute improvement, n = 101). The composite of HF readmission and all-cause mortality was considered the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Results:
The characteristics of HFimpEF differed from other HF phenotypes. β-blockers and aldosterone receptor antagonists were associated with improved LVEF. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the lowest incidence of the composite endpoint (p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (p < 0.001) in HFimpEF. The risk of cardiovascular death was lowest in HFimpEF after controlling for competing events (p < 0.001), as were competing events (p < 0.001). Valvular heart disease (VHD) (HR 8.555, 95 CI% 2.126-34.420, p = 0.003) increased the risk of all-cause death, and anemia increased the risk of all-cause death (HR 5.533, 95 CI% 1.592-19.530, p = 0.007) and cardiovascular death in HFimpEF patients (HR 5.840, 95 CI% 1.088-31.356, p = 0.040).
Conclusions:
HFimpEF is an independent HF phenotype with a prognosis similar to HFmrEF and superior to HFpEF and HFrEF. When HFimpEF patients had VHD and anemia, the endpoint event rate was increased.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

