Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

05:50
Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
Published on: January 16, 2020
5.9K
Research on the Behavior Evolution of Interest Groups in Book Reverse Logistics
Shuihai Dou1, Xianyang Su1, Yanping Du1
1Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, China.
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
|March 28, 2022
Summary
Book companies face increasing inventory backlogs due to rising returns. Optimizing book reverse logistics requires both publishers and retailers to participate, driven by benefits and costs.
Area of Science:
- Supply Chain Management
- Operations Research
Background:
- The expanding book market and increased publications lead to a rise in book returns and exchanges.
- This surge in reverse logistics exacerbates inventory backlog issues for book companies, particularly publishers and retailers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the strategic participation of book publishers and retailers in reverse logistics optimization.
- To identify the conditions under which both parties are incentivized to engage in optimizing book returns and exchanges.
Main Methods:
- Construction of a two-party game model involving book publishers and book retailers.
- Theoretical analysis of the evolution of participation strategies.
- Numerical simulation to assess the influence of parameter changes on stable strategies.
Main Results:
- Participation in book reverse logistics optimization is contingent upon the perceived benefits and costs for both publishers and retailers.
- The decision to participate is interdependent, with each party's choice influenced by the other's involvement.
Conclusions:
- Both book publishers and retailers must weigh their respective benefits and costs when deciding to participate in reverse logistics optimization.
- A specific cost threshold for reverse logistics participation maximizes the likelihood of both publishers and retailers engaging in optimization efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Social Traps
23.8K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
23.8K
Impact of Groups on Groups
17
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
17
Impact of Individuals on a Group
18
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
18
Social Proof
29.0K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.0K
Group Polarization
35.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.9K
Social Loafing
36.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.4K

