Interrater reproducibility of the 2016 American society of echocardiography left ventricular diastolic function

Jonathan M Wong1, Christiane M Abouzeid2, Thuy D Nguyen3

  • 1California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

Insights

This study found excellent interreader reliability for Doppler measurements but only moderate agreement for grading diastolic dysfunction using 2016 guidelines. This highlights variability in assessing diastolic dysfunction.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Echocardiography

Background:

  • Limited data exist on interreader variability in diastolic measurements.
  • The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines for left ventricular (LV) diastolic function are widely used.
  • Understanding variability in applying these guidelines is crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess interreader variability of diastolic measurements.
  • To evaluate the agreement in grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) using the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines.
  • To identify predictors of disagreement in DD grading.

Main Methods:

  • 49 volunteers from a cardiology practice were recruited.
  • Diastolic dysfunction (DD) presence and grade were determined using the 2016 LV diastolic function guideline algorithm.
  • Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Fleiss K-statistics were calculated to assess agreement.

Main Results:

  • Excellent interreader reliability (ICC > .90) was observed for mitral inflow and tissue Doppler velocities.
  • Moderate-good reliability (ICC .80-.86) was found for LV volumes, and moderate reliability (ICC .56) for LA volume.
  • Agreement for DD presence (K = .68) and grade (K = .59) was moderate-good but not excellent.

Conclusions:

  • The 2016 ASE/EACVI diastolic guidelines demonstrate excellent interrater reliability for Doppler measurements.
  • Volumetric measurements show moderate-good interrater reliability.
  • Agreement on the overall diastolic grade is moderate-good, indicating areas for potential improvement in guideline application.
Abstract