Infigratinib in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas and FGFR Alterations: A Multicenter Phase II Study

Andrew B Lassman1, Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez2, Timothy F Cloughesy3

  • 1Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.

Abstract

Insights

Infigratinib showed limited efficacy for recurrent gliomas with FGFR alterations. However, some patients with specific FGFR1/FGFR3 mutations or fusions experienced durable disease control, suggesting potential for targeted therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Molecular oncology
  • Clinical pharmacology

Background:

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) genomic alterations, including amplification, mutations, and fusions, are present in approximately 8% of gliomas, with FGFR1 and FGFR3 being the most commonly affected.
  • Recurrent gliomas with FGFR alterations represent a significant unmet need, driving the investigation of targeted therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infigratinib, a selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor, in adult patients with recurrent gliomas harboring FGFR genomic alterations.
  • To explore potential molecular correlations between FGFR alterations and treatment response.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial was conducted.
  • Adult patients with recurrent/progressive gliomas and documented FGFR alterations received oral infigratinib (125 mg daily for 21 days of 28-day cycles).
  • The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, assessed by investigator using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on pretreatment tumor tissue.

Main Results:

  • The 6-month PFS rate was 16.0% (95% CI, 5.0-32.5), with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-2.8). The objective response rate was 3.8%.
  • Notably, 4 patients achieved durable disease control for over a year. Three of these patients had tumors with activating FGFR1 (K656E) or FGFR3 (K650E) point mutations, and one had an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion.
  • Hyperphosphatemia was the most common treatment-related adverse event (76.9% all-grade, 3.8% grade 3), consistent with on-target FGFR inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • Monotherapy with infigratinib demonstrated limited overall efficacy in patients with recurrent gliomas and diverse FGFR alterations.
  • Durable disease control was observed in a subset of patients with specific FGFR1/FGFR3 point mutations or FGFR3-TACC3 fusions.
  • Further investigation with refined biomarker selection and centralized FGFR testing is warranted to optimize patient selection for FGFR-targeted therapies.

Related Concept Videos