Why COVID vaccines for young children (5-11 years) are not essential at this moment in time?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Luciferase-fluorescent Reporter Influenza Virus for Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection
Published on: August 14, 2019
1Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, West Yorkshire, UK. hamid.merchant@hud.ac.uk.
Insights
The UK
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
Background:
- The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises COVID-19 vaccines for 5-11-year-olds are non-essential, sparking debate.
- This contrasts with established childhood vaccination schedules, like annual influenza immunizations.
- Public health professionals question the rationale behind excluding young children from COVID-19 vaccination programs.
Discussion:
- COVID-19 vaccines induce cellular, humoral, and mucosal immunity.
- Rushing mass vaccination in children may not be optimal.
- Delayed vaccination could allow for development of more suitable pediatric formulations, such as nasal vaccines.
Key Insights:
- Childhood immunization aims to reduce suffering, prevent community transmission, and minimize school absenteeism.
- Current COVID-19 vaccines' mechanisms of action are detailed, including their impact on different immunity types.
- The potential benefits of a delayed, tailored approach to pediatric COVID-19 vaccination are explored.
Outlook:
- Await development of pediatric-specific formulations like nasal COVID vaccines for improved infection and transmission protection.
- Re-evaluate the public health benefits of mass pediatric immunization programs for COVID-19.
- Consider the long-term implications for children's quality of life and protection against preventable infections.
Abstract:
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) in UK has recently advised that COVID vaccines in 5-11-year-old children is non-essential. This has created an outrage among some healthcare professionals who believed a mandatory vaccination program for all ages would be more beneficial. The JCVI decision sounds strange to many public health professionals in light of the existing practices with regards to other children's vaccines, for instance flu jabs. The child immunisation should help reduce suffering in children, prevent virus spread in communities, reduce school off days, prevent the loss of quality of life in children and the sufferings from a preventable infection. Therefore, why not support essential COVID vaccines for young children like we do for the flu? This article explains the underlying mechanisms of currently deployed COVID vaccines, the cellular, humoral and mucosal immunity. The article explains why we should not rush mass-immunising young children and a delayed immunisation can be beneficial in offering a more suitable vaccine formulation for children, such as the nasal COVID vaccine, that is going to be available soon and will provide the sought-after protection against infection and transmission, the public health benefit from the mass immunisation program in children.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Preventive Healthcare Services
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

