Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Coronary artery bypass on survival in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation: meta-analysis
Insights
Combining mitral valve surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers no survival benefit over CABG alone for patients with moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation. This meta-analysis found no significant differences in short- or long-term survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Mitral Valve Disease
Background:
- Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation (IMVR) is a common complication after myocardial infarction.
- Surgical intervention for IMVR, including isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or CABG combined with mitral valve surgery (cMVS), is debated.
- Evaluating the impact of these procedures on patient survival is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the comparative effect of CABG versus cMVS on post-operative survival in patients with moderate IMVR.
- To synthesize evidence from existing studies to inform treatment strategies for IMVR.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI Data) up to January 2020.
- Included studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted.
- A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 to compare survival outcomes between the CABG and cMVS groups.
Main Results:
- The meta-analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials and 14 retrospective studies, totaling 4476 patients (2278 in CABG group, 1698 in cMVS group).
- No statistically significant differences were observed in recent mortality (OR = 0.88, p = 0.62), 1-year survival (OR = 1.03, p = 0.82; OR = 1.07, p = 0.62), or long-term survival (OR = 0.95, p = 0.61) between the cMVS and CABG groups.
- These findings suggest that adding mitral valve surgery to CABG does not improve survival outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence indicates that combining mitral valve surgery with CABG does not confer a survival advantage compared to CABG alone in patients with moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation.
- Further research may be warranted to explore other potential benefits or specific patient subgroups that might benefit from cMVS.
Objective:
The objective of the study was to systematically evaluate the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or CABG combined with mitral valve surgery (cMVS) on post-operative survival in patients with moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation.
Materials And Methods:
Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE LIBRARY, WanFang Data, and CNKI Data were searched from inception to January 2020. According to the inclusion criterion, relevant articles were screened. After that we extracted data, assessed quality, and performed meta-analysis using RevMan 5.2.
Results:
A total of 4 randomized controlled trial and 14 retrospective study involving 4476 patients were included in the study. The CABG group was 2278 and the cMVS group was 1698. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with CABG group, there were no statistically significant differences in the recent mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, p = 0.62), 1-year survival (OR = 1.03, p = 0.82), 1-year survival (OR = 1.07, p = 0.62), and long-term survival (OR = 0.95, p = 0.61) of the cMVS group.
Conclusion:
Current evidence indicates that patients in the cMVS group did not benefit from CABG group in survival after surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

