Secondary Immunosuppression in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

Currentimmunosuppressive treatments for kidney transplant recipients have improved graft viability at the expense of impaired immune surveillance. The tools for monitoring immune status in pediatric kidney transplant recipients have not been widely investigated. Better knowledge could help recognize over immunosuppression and allow implementation of individualized preventive strategies.

This retrospective and observational study included 28 pediatric kidney transplant recipients treated at a tertiary hospital. We measured peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, immunoglobulins, immunosuppressivedrug levels, and viral loads. Reference analytical values for different age ranges were used to determine immune status. We recorded overall hospitalizations due to opportunistic infections and positive viral loads posttransplant.

We found hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphopenia in 19% and 41% of the patients, respectively. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations were below normal limits in one-third of the sample. These parameters were not related to the current number or plasma levels of immunosuppressive drugs. During follow-up, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and BK virus viremias were detected in 60.7% of the patients. Admissions due to opportunistic infections happened in 57.1%, mainly related to severe viral disease (30%) or gastrointestinal infections (26.7%). Most occurred in younger transplant recipients and during the first 2 years posttransplant (73.3%). We found no significant relation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and hospital admissions for opportunistic infections or positive viral loads during follow-up.

Recurrent hospitalizations for opportunistic infections and analytical disorders in the immune system suggested that secondary immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients was frequent. Immunosuppression was not directly related to plasma drug levels or the number of immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, immune monitoring might be helpful in combination with immunosuppressant levels to assess immunosuppression status and to establish individualized preventive measures.