Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025
Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
Published on: May 6, 2014
Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Rater Reliability of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile:
Alex E Clain1, Munirah Alkhuwaiter1, Kate Davidson2
1Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to extend the assessment of the psychometric properties of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP). Here, we re-examined structural validity and internal consistency using a large clinical-registry data set and formally examined rater reliability in a smaller data set.
Method:
This study consists of a retrospective structural validity and internal consistency analysis of MBSImP using a large data set (N = 52,726) drawn from the MBSImP Swallowing Data Registry and a prospective study of the interrater and intrarater reliability of a subset of studies (N = 50) rated by four MBSImP-trained speech-language pathologists. Structural validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha for each of the multicomponent MBSImP domains, namely, the oral and pharyngeal domains. Interrater reliability and intrarater reliability were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
The exploratory factor analysis showed a two-factor solution with factors precisely corresponding to the scale's oral and pharyngeal domains, consistent with findings from the initial study. Component 17, that is, the esophageal domain, did not load onto either factor. Internal consistency was good for both the oral and pharyngeal domains (αoral = .81, αpharyngeal = .87). Interrater reliability was found to be good with ICCinterrater = .78 (95% confidence interval [CI; .76, .80]). Intrarater reliability was good for each rater, ICCRater-1 = .82 (95% CI [.77, .86]), ICCRater-2 = .83 (95% CI [.79, .87]), ICCRater-3 = .87 (95% CI [.83, .90]), and ICCRater-4 = .87 (95% CI [.83, .90]).
Conclusions:
This study leverages a large-scale, clinical data set to provide strong, generalizable evidence that the MBSImP assessment method has excellent structural validity and internal consistency. In addition, the results show that MBSImP-trained speech-language pathologists can demonstrate good interrater and intrarater reliability.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
01:17Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
01:23Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
01:29Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...