Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025
Author Spotlight: Automated Infusion and Blood Sampling for Precise Hormonal Analysis in Conscious Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Is there a relationship between luteinizing hormone levels and ART outcome in GnRH antagonist protocols? A
Maryam Eftekhar1, Masrooreh Hoseini1, Nasim Tabibnejad1
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Objective:
To evaluate the potential link between serum LH concentrations on the day of oocyte triggering and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data of women ≤42 years undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycles and who had downregulated with GnRH antagonist protocol in a 12-month period was reviewed. Patients with incomplete hospital records were excluded. Women were divided into four groups based on the percentiles of the serum LH level on the day of oocyte triggering: <1.49 (<25th percentile), 1.49-2.59 (25-50th percentile), 2.60-4.60 (50-75th percentile), and >4.60 IU/L (>75th percentile). Clinical pregnancy was considered the primary outcome, while chemical pregnancy and implantation rate were the most important secondary outcomes which were compared between the four groups.
Results:
Four hundred and nighty-three women of 1003 infertile women, who were initially assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 426 women were analyzed. Levels of progesterone were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the >4.60 IU/L group (r = 0.20, P = 0.034). Furthermore, the levels of estradiol were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the <1.49 IU/L (r = 0.21, P = 0.026). The number of retrieved oocytes, 2PNs (two pronucleis), number, and quality of total embryos were similar between groups (P > 0.05). With regard to oocyte maturity rate, fertilization proportion, fertilization rate, chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, there was no difference between varied LH levels in the four groups (P > 0.05). The only observed difference was the implantation rate that was significantly higher in the 2.60-4.60 IU/L group than the <1.49 IU/L group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Our result could not show the potential link between LH concentrations during GnRH antagonist cycles and pregnancy outcomes. However, very low LH levels during ovarian stimulation period may negatively affect the implantation rate.
