Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Energy requirements for defibrillation.

R E Kerber

    Circulation
    |December 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    For successful defibrillation, start with 200 J. Repeat the same energy if the first shock fails, then increase if needed. Lower energy levels may be safer and effective for cardiac resuscitation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    New and exciting developments in defibrillation--what will we be doing in 2010?

    Singapore medical journal·2002
    Same author

    Cerebral embolism resulting from a transvenous pacemaker catheter inadvertently placed in the left ventricle: a report of two cases confirmed by echocardiography.

    Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2002
    Same author

    Pediatric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveforms in an experimental model.

    Resuscitation·2001
    Same author

    Biphasic and monophasic transthoracic defibrillation in pigs with acute left ventricular dysfunction.

    Resuscitation·2001
    Same author

    Does electrode polarity alter the energy requirements for transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation? Experimental studies.

    Resuscitation·2001
    Same author

    Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors decrease coronary sinus-free radical concentration and ameliorate myocardial stunning in an ischemia-reperfusion model.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2001
    Same journal

    Eugene Braunwald, MD, 1929-2026.

    Circulation·2026
    Same journal

    AHA/ACC/ESC/WHF Expert Consensus Document: Second Universal Definition of Heart Failure (2026).

    Circulation·2026
    Same journal

    Advancing Quality in the Evaluation, Surveillance, and Management of Aortic Stenosis: A Report From the AHA Target: AS Registry.

    Circulation·2026
    Same journal

    Heart Failure Occurring in the Perinatal Period: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Circulation·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Circulation·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to: The Natural History of Massive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Multiregistry Analysis.

    Circulation·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Medical Devices
    • Emergency Medicine

    Background:

    • Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a life-threatening arrhythmia requiring prompt defibrillation.
    • Optimal initial energy selection for defibrillation remains a key consideration in resuscitation protocols.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose an evidence-based algorithm for selecting defibrillation energy levels.
    • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of initial low-energy shocks for defibrillation.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of available clinical data on defibrillation success rates.
    • Analysis of the impact of initial shock energy on patient outcomes.
    • Development of an energy selection algorithm based on clinical evidence.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • An initial shock energy of 200 J effectively defibrillates most patients.
    • Higher initial energies offer no discernible advantage and may increase risks.
    • Transthoracic impedance measurements could potentially allow for even lower initial energies.
    • Immediate repetition of an ineffective shock at the same energy is recommended before increasing it.

    Conclusions:

    • A 200 J initial energy level is recommended for defibrillation.
    • A stepwise approach to energy escalation is advised if initial shocks are unsuccessful.
    • Repeating a 200 J shock for late refibrillation is effective, avoiding unnecessary energy increases.