Is It Time for Australia to Reassess Its Legislation on Human Embryo Experimentation?

The United Kingdom Warnock Committee (1984) was a landmark contributor to the ethics and law governing human embryo experimentation. It recommended a time limit up to 14 days of development after fertilisation within which such experimentation may take place, which mirrors the late 1970s' proposal of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Ethics Advisory Board (EAB). This study analyses the EAB's and the Warnock Committee's reasoning and conclusions regarding what constitutes ethical behaviour towards the human embryo. Current embryology and recently created embryo-like structures are considered. After the Warnock Report, several Australian Federal and State committees in Australia investigated the ethics which should guide experimentation on human embryos. The reports of these Australian committees are reviewed and the potential influence of both earlier committees on their deliberations is discussed. The rationale informing current Australian law governing human embryo experimentation is examined. Considering current more advanced knowledge of embryology, it is concluded that this legislation should be reassessed.