Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Re-evaluating hypertension in children according to different guidelines: a single-center study
Cemaliye Basaran1, Belde Kasap Demir2,3, Mustafa Agah Tekindal4
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey. cemaliyebasaran@gmail.com.
Insights
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guideline shows higher sensitivity for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in children, particularly normal-weight adolescents. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) thresholds had limited effectiveness in this assessment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Background:
- Office blood pressure (OBP) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) are crucial for diagnosing hypertension in children.
- Discrepancies exist among various guidelines for interpreting OBP and ABPM, impacting risk stratification for conditions like left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- Accurate assessment of blood pressure phenotypes is essential for identifying children at risk of cardiovascular complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between different guidelines for OBP and ABPM in children.
- To determine the optimal blood pressure (BP) thresholds for identifying children at risk of LVH.
- To compare the sensitivity of various BP phenotypes in predicting LVH across different age and body mass index (BMI) groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of agreements between OBP and ABPM guidelines (Fourth Report, ESH, AAP, Wühl, AHA) in 949 pediatric patients.
- Creation of nine distinct BP phenotype combinations.
- Determination of the sensitivity of these phenotypes for predicting LVH, stratified by age and BMI.
Main Results:
- Good to very good agreement was observed between OBP and ABPM guidelines (κ=0.639 and κ=0.986, respectively).
- BP phenotype combinations showed very good agreement (κ=0.880).
- The AAP guideline demonstrated the highest sensitivity for detecting LVH in <12-year-old obese children (75.8%) and normal-weight adolescents aged 13-15 years (88.8%). ABPM thresholds showed limited effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- The AAP guideline is more sensitive and decisive for identifying children at risk of LVH, especially normal-weight children up to 15 years.
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring thresholds for children appear to have a limited effect in predicting LVH compared to OBP guidelines.
- Further research may refine BP phenotyping for improved LVH risk assessment in pediatric populations.
Abstract:
We aimed to evaluate the agreements between the guidelines used for both office blood pressure (OBP) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Our secondary aim was to define the best threshold to assess children at risk of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Thresholds proposed by the Fourth Report (FR), European Society of Hypertension (ESH), and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for OBP and the Wühl, ESH, and American Heart Association (AHA) for ABPM were used, and nine different BP phenotype combinations were created. The agreements between the thresholds, the sensitivity of the thresholds, and the BP phenotypes used to predict LVH were determined in 949 patients with different ages and body mass indices (BMIs). The agreements between the guidelines for OBP and ABPM were "good" and "very good" (κ = 0.639; 95% CI, 0.638-0.640, κ = 0.986; 95% CI, 0.985-0.988), respectively. To classify OBP and ABPM into BP phenotypes, we obtained nine different combinations, which had "very good" agreement (κ = 0.880; 95% CI, 0.879-0.880). The sensitivity of AAP for detecting LVH was the highest in <12-year-old obese children (S = 75.8, 95% CI, 56.4-89.7). The sensitivity of ABPM in detecting LVH was similar among different age and BMI groups. The sensitivity of different BP phenotypes tended to be higher in the groups where OBP was evaluated according to AAP. The highest sensitivity was detected in the 13- to 15-year-old normal weight group.(S: 88.8, 95% CI, 51.7-99.7). The AAP guideline is more sensitive and decisive for BP phenotypes to detect LVH, especially in normal-weight children ≤ 15 years, while ABPM thresholds for children have limited effect.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

