Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Mitral valve repair versus replacement in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation systematic review and meta-analysis
Mohamed A Gamal1, Mohamed M El-Fiky1, Mahmoud M Gamea1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Background And Aim:
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a serious consequence of coronary artery disease. The choice of the optimal surgical strategy remains debatable. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes of mitral valve repair (RPR) versus replacement (RPL) regarding perioperative mortality, overall mortality, reoperation, recurrence of MR, and reverse remodeling after surgery.
Methods:
Electronic searches were performed using the searchable databases of Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Embase, and the search terms mitral valve, IMR, RPR, RPL, and coronary artery bypass grafting. The main outcomes of interest are perioperative mortality, overall mortality, reoperation, recurrence of MR, and reverse remodeling after surgery. Perioperative mortality was defined as death during the surgery or within 30 days after the operation.
Results:
There was a trend towards better perioperative survival in the RPR arm. However, the difference fell short of statistical significance [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.66 (0.41-1.07), p = 0.09]. Patients submitted to RPR experienced a significantly higher MR recurrence rate when compared with their counterparts submitted to RPL [OR (95% CI): 16.8 (5.07-55.7, p = 0.00001)].
Conclusion:
There is a trend towards lower perioperative mortality in RPR in comparison to RPL. On the other hand, RPL was associated with significantly lower recurrence rates.
Insights
Mitral valve repair (RPR) may offer better perioperative survival for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), but replacement (RPL) significantly reduces MR recurrence. The optimal surgical strategy requires careful consideration of these outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Research
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a significant complication of coronary artery disease.
- The optimal surgical approach for IMR, whether mitral valve repair (RPR) or replacement (RPL), remains a subject of debate.
- This meta-analysis compares RPR and RPL outcomes in IMR patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the perioperative and overall mortality rates of RPR versus RPL for IMR.
- To evaluate differences in reoperation rates, mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence, and reverse remodeling between RPR and RPL.
- To provide evidence-based insights for surgical decision-making in IMR.
Main Methods:
- Systematic electronic literature searches were conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase.
- Key search terms included mitral valve, IMR, RPR, RPL, and coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Primary outcomes assessed were perioperative mortality, overall mortality, reoperation, MR recurrence, and reverse remodeling.
Main Results:
- A trend towards lower perioperative mortality was observed in the RPR group, though not statistically significant (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.41-1.07; p=0.09).
- Patients undergoing RPR experienced a significantly higher rate of MR recurrence compared to those who had RPL (OR 16.8; 95% CI 5.07-55.7; p=0.00001).
Conclusions:
- Mitral valve repair (RPR) shows a trend towards reduced perioperative mortality in IMR patients.
- Mitral valve replacement (RPL) is associated with significantly lower rates of MR recurrence.
- The choice between RPR and RPL for IMR necessitates balancing perioperative risks with long-term recurrence rates.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

