Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region02:40

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

16.9K
The eukaryotic promoter region is a segment of DNA located upstream of a gene. It contains an RNA polymerase binding site, a transcription start site, and several cis-regulatory sequences.  The proximal promoter region is located in the vicinity of the gene and has cis-regulatory sequences and the core promoter. The core promoter is the binding site for RNA polymerase and is usually located between -35 and +35 nucleotides from the transcription start site. The distal promoter regions are...
16.9K
Transcription Initiation01:47

Transcription Initiation

17.1K
Initiation is the first step of transcription in eukaryotes. Prokaryotic RNA Polymerase (RNAP) can bind to the template DNA and start transcribing. On the other hand, transcription in eukaryotes requires additional proteins, called transcription factors, to first bind to the promoter region in the DNA template. This binding helps recruit the specific RNAP that can assemble on the DNA and start transcription.
The promoters and enhancers and their accessory proteins allow tight regulation of...
17.1K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

6.7K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
6.7K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

10.3K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
10.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unbiased distance correlation with sample-size-aware confidence bounds for comparative omics network analysis.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

A reliable and verified dataset of functional miRNA-mRNA target interactions for gene regulation studies.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Spark: sparse hierarchical energy minimization for scalable prediction of RNA pseudoknots.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

The Alberta Quality Assessment Tool: Risk of Bias (AQAT:RoB) for the Evaluation of Medical Large Language Model Question-Answer Studies: Development and Pilot Validation.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

The Alberta Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (AQAT:RoB) for the Evaluation of Medical Large Language Model Question-Answer Studies: Development and Pilot Validation.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Methylation and algorithms in biological aging: a scoping review.

Frontiers in aging·2026
Same journal

Research on multi-trait genome association study method based on Shannon information entropy.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A multi-view feature fusion framework with interpretable graph convolution for predicting microbe-drug associations.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions
10:16

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions

Published on: June 28, 2018

32.7K

Supervised promoter recognition: a benchmark framework.

Raul I Perez Martell1, Alison Ziesel2, Hosna Jabbari2

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. ivanpmartell@uvic.ca.

BMC Bioinformatics
|April 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models for promoter recognition show unreliable performance on eukaryotic genomic sequences. A new framework, SUPR REF, highlights the need for standardized datasets and evaluation to accurately assess these models.

Keywords:
BioinformaticsDeep learningMachine learningPromoter recognition

More Related Videos

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
08:54

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression

Published on: March 29, 2019

7.2K
Methods to Discover Alternative Promoter Usage and Transcriptional Regulation of Murine Bcrp1
11:02

Methods to Discover Alternative Promoter Usage and Transcriptional Regulation of Murine Bcrp1

Published on: May 27, 2016

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions
10:16

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions

Published on: June 28, 2018

32.7K
In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
08:54

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression

Published on: March 29, 2019

7.2K
Methods to Discover Alternative Promoter Usage and Transcriptional Regulation of Murine Bcrp1
11:02

Methods to Discover Alternative Promoter Usage and Transcriptional Regulation of Murine Bcrp1

Published on: May 27, 2016

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Deep learning is widely used for identifying genomic regulatory sequences like promoters.
  • Previous studies reported improved performance of deep learning models for promoter recognition.
  • Lack of standardized datasets and benchmarking procedures hinders accurate performance comparison of these models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a framework (SUPR REF) for systematic training, validation, testing, and comparison of promoter recognition models.
  • To develop biologically relevant benchmark datasets for evaluating deep learning models.
  • To reassess the performance of existing deep learning models using standardized benchmarks.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Supervised Promoter Recognition Framework (SUPR REF).
  • Creation of standardized, biologically relevant benchmark datasets for promoter recognition.
  • Systematic evaluation and comparison of deep learning models on these new datasets.

Main Results:

  • Deep learning models demonstrate low reliability for ab initio promoter recognition on eukaryotic genomic sequences.
  • Overall performance of current models remains insufficient, particularly for RNA Polymerase II core promoters.
  • Cross-validation results from small datasets require cautious interpretation due to their observational nature.

Conclusions:

  • The reliability of deep learning for promoter recognition needs significant improvement.
  • Standardized benchmarking is crucial for accurate model assessment in genomics.
  • Further research is needed to enhance the performance and reliability of computational promoter prediction tools.