Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Peak atrio-ventricular mechanics predicts exercise tolerance in heart failure patients
Shantanu P Sengupta1, Nduka C Okwose2, Guy A MacGowan3
1Sengupta Hospital and Research Institute, Ravinagar, Nagpur, India; Cardiovascular Research Theme, Translational and Clinical, and Biosciences Research Institutes, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK.
Purpose:
Exercise intolerance is a cardinal symptom of patients with heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in comparison with those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have disproportionate exercise-induced impairment of left atrial (LA) function that may explain the effort intolerance.
Methods:
Total 40 HFpEF patients, 40 HFrEF patients, and 20 matched healthy controls underwent resting and exercise stress transthoracic echocardiography using modified Bruce protocol with speckle-tracking derived assessments of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS).
Results:
In comparison to controls, PALS and LVGLS were reduced in HFpEF and HFrEF patients (P < 0.01); however, the strain magnitudes were significantly lower in HFrEF than in HFpEF (P < 0.01). Both HFpEF and HFrEF showed a 28% and 30% reduction in exercise time in comparison with controls (HFpEF, 363 ± 152, HFrEF 352 ± 91, controls, 505 ± 42 s, P < 0.01) and exercise-related rise in E/E' in HFpEF patients. However, during exercise PALS reduced from resting values by 26% (resting 23.1 ± 4.7 and peak 18.5 ± 3.5, P < 0.01) in HFpEF but only 8% in HFrEF (resting 11.5 ± 1.4 and peak 10.5 ± 1.5, P < 0.01), and remained unchanged in controls (resting 34 ± 1.9 and peak 34.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.4). Regression analysis of the combined data from the HF patients and controls revealed that PALS was independently associated with exercise time such that a 1% reduction in PALS was associated with a 10 s reduction in exercise duration (p < 0.01). PALS at baseline and peak exercise differentiated normal from HF patients. LVGLS at baseline and peak exercise differentiated HFpEF from HFrEF and patients of HFpEF showed abnormality of both PALS and LVGLS.
Conclusion:
Although left ventricle and LA strain are lower in HFrEF than HFpEF at rest and exercise compared to healthy controls, patients with HFpEF show more profound deterioration of LA reservoir function with exercise which appears to contribute to exercise intolerance.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiac Output I:Effect of Heart Rate on Cardiac Output
Cardiac output (CO) refers to the total amount of blood ejected by one of the ventricles in liters per minute (L/min). In a resting adult, CO ranges from 5 to 6 L/min, adjusting according to the body's metabolic requirements.
Effect of Heart Rate on Cardiac Output
Cardiac output adapts to metabolic demands during stress, physical activity, or illness. The autonomic nervous system regulates heart rate via the sinoatrial node. The parasympathetic nervous system decreases heart...
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction