Perinatal Mortality and its Causes in a Rural Block in Tamil Nadu, Southern India: A Community-Based Nonconcurrent

Anne George Cherian1, Cherryl Tryphena1, Kuryan George1

  • 1Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Insights

Perinatal mortality (PM) rates significantly declined in rural India over a decade, with fewer small for gestational age fetuses. Understanding causes through pregnancy registration improves outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal Health
  • Maternal and Child Epidemiology
  • Global Health Statistics

Background:

  • High global infant mortality necessitates better data on perinatal mortality (PM) and its causes, especially in regions like India.
  • Existing data on perinatal mortality and stillbirths is scarce in many parts of India.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate stillbirth (SB), early neonatal, and perinatal mortality rates in a rural Indian block over ten years.
  • To identify the primary causes of perinatal mortality and associated maternal risk factors.

Main Methods:

  • A nonconcurrent cohort study analyzed births, stillbirths, and early neonatal deaths from 2008 to 2017.
  • WHO-PM classification was used for cause allocation and maternal risk factor analysis.
  • Standard growth charts classified birth weights and identified small for gestational age fetuses.

Main Results:

  • Perinatal mortality rate decreased significantly from 32 to 11 per 1000 births.
  • The incidence of small for gestational age fetuses dropped from 20% to 12.5%.
  • Antepartum hypoxia (34.4%) and fetal growth disorders (26.3%) were leading causes of stillbirths; intrapartum events caused 32.8% of early neonatal deaths.

Conclusions:

  • A consistent decline in perinatal mortality and small for gestational age fetuses was observed over the decade.
  • Pregnancy registration and follow-up are crucial for understanding and mitigating perinatal mortality.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
742
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
291
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
878
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
461
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
431
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K