Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

06:51
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
8.5K
Is Higher-Order Misrepresentation Empirically Plausible? An Argument From Corruption
1Theoretical Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Frontiers in Psychology
|April 4, 2022
Summary
This study argues that misrepresentation in consciousness is plausible, suggesting that corrupted brain states can lead to inaccurate conscious experiences. This challenges alternative theories by highlighting the brain
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Philosophy of Mind
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Higher-order theories of consciousness posit that conscious states can involve misrepresentation.
- The brain's role in generating conscious states is a central assumption in many theories.
- Neural processes are known to be susceptible to corruption, influencing cognitive and behavioral outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an empirically-based argument for the plausibility of misrepresentation in consciousness.
- To challenge the 'no-consciousness' reply as a theoretical alternative.
- To offer a novel, meta-level argument for misrepresentation in conscious states.
Main Methods:
- The argument assumes conscious states are brain-generated.
- It posits that corrupted neural states can lead to misrepresentation.
- It contrasts the misrepresentation hypothesis with the 'no-consciousness' reply using current neuroscience and cognitive science knowledge.
Main Results:
- Corruption of neural states is possible and frequent, supporting the potential for misrepresentation.
- The 'no-consciousness' reply appears less supported by current empirical evidence in consciousness and cognition.
- The argument provides a meta-level framework for discussing misrepresentation.
Conclusions:
- Misrepresentation in consciousness is plausible, stemming from potential corruption in neural processes.
- The empirical evidence leans against the 'no-consciousness' reply.
- This meta-level argument offers a broadly acceptable framework for the debate on consciousness and misrepresentation.
Related Concept Videos
Correspondence Bias
13
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
13
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
25
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
25
Understanding Deception
12
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
12
False Memories
158
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
158
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Cause and Effect
11.4K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.4K

