Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Endogenous timing in three-player Tullock contests
Kyung Hwan Baik1,2, Jong Hwa Lee3, Seokho Lee4
1Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608 USA.
In a three-player Tullock contest with endogenous timing, players strategically choose when to exert effort. With moderate player asymmetries, all players opt for simultaneous effort at the earliest opportunity.
Area of Science:
- Game Theory
- Behavioral Economics
- Industrial Organization
Background:
- Tullock contests are widely used models to study rent-seeking and resource allocation.
- Endogenous timing introduces strategic considerations regarding the timing of actions, influencing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the timing decisions of players in a three-player Tullock contest with endogenous timing.
- To investigate how player asymmetries affect the chosen timing of effort exertion.
Main Methods:
- The study employs a theoretical model of a three-player Tullock contest.
- Players independently and simultaneously choose between two discrete time points to exert effort.
- Subsequent effort levels are chosen at the announced times.
Main Results:
- When player asymmetries are moderate, all players strategically announce the first available time point.
- Consequently, all players exert effort simultaneously in the first period.
- This outcome contrasts with findings in two-player asymmetric contests.
Conclusions:
- The endogenous timing framework reveals a tendency towards simultaneous action in three-player Tullock contests under moderate asymmetry.
- Player interactions and asymmetries significantly shape strategic timing decisions in contest models.
More Related Videos
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Robbers Cave
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Limits to Natural Selection