Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Clinical and echocardiographic differences in three different etiologies of severe mitral stenosis
Shunsuke Kagawa1, Taku Omori1, Goki Uno1
1Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background:
In our institute, the causes of mitral stenosis (MS) are generally categorized into three main etiologies-rheumatic MS (RMS), degenerative MS with annular and leaflet calcification, and post-clip MS as a consequence of transcatheter mitral valve repair with clips for treating mitral regurgitation. However, clinical differences among the three etiologies are uncertain.
Methods:
We retrospectively assessed 293 consecutive patients (53 with RMS, 118 with degenerative MS, and 122 with post-clip MS) who had a three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) derived mitral valve orifice area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2 , and a mean transmitral pressure gradient of ≥5 mmHg on transthoracic echocardiography.
Results:
Although there was no difference in 3D-TEE-derived MVA among the three groups, patients with post-clip MS had a significantly lower mean transmitral pressure gradient compared to those with either of the other two types of MS (10.8 ([7.9-15.2] mmHg vs. 9.6 [7.3-12.5] mmHg vs. 6.9 [6.0-9.2] mmHg; p < .001). Patients with RMS had a higher prevalence of dyspnea. The independent determinants of dyspnea were pressure half time in RMS, 3D-TEE-derived MVA and estimated right atrial pressure in degenerative MS, and left ventricle ejection fraction in post-clip MS.
Conclusions:
Patients with post-clip MS had the lowest mean transmitral pressure gradient, and patients with RMS had the highest prevalence of dyspnea, despite having a similar 3D-TEE-derived MVA. The determinants of dyspnea were different among the three etiologies of MS.
Insights
Mitral stenosis (MS) from different causes have distinct clinical features. Post-clip MS shows a lower pressure gradient, while rheumatic MS (RMS) has more dyspnea, despite similar valve areas.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Mitral stenosis (MS) is categorized into rheumatic MS (RMS), degenerative MS, and post-transcatheter mitral valve repair MS (post-clip MS).
- Clinical distinctions among these MS etiologies remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical differences among rheumatic MS, degenerative MS, and post-clip MS.
- To identify specific determinants of dyspnea in each MS etiology.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 293 patients with MS (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm²).
- Categorization into RMS (n=53), degenerative MS (n=118), and post-clip MS (n=122).
- Utilized three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 3D-TEE-derived mitral valve area (MVA) across the three groups.
- Post-clip MS patients exhibited a significantly lower mean transmitral pressure gradient (p < .001).
- Rheumatic MS patients had a higher prevalence of dyspnea.
Conclusions:
- Post-clip MS is associated with the lowest mean transmitral pressure gradient, and RMS with the highest dyspnea prevalence, despite similar MVAs.
- Determinants of dyspnea vary significantly across the three MS etiologies: pressure half-time in RMS, MVA and right atrial pressure in degenerative MS, and left ventricle ejection fraction in post-clip MS.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

