Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
A randomized controlled trial of a proportionate universal parenting program delivery model (E-SEE Steps) to enhance
Tracey Bywater1, Vashti Berry2, Sarah Blower1
1Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Insights
The E-SEE Steps parenting program showed no significant improvements in child social-emotional wellbeing or maternal depression. While borderline cost-effective, its effectiveness was limited by variable fidelity and low uptake of key components.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Parenting Interventions
- Public Health
Background:
- Evidence on parenting programs for children under three is inconclusive.
- The E-SEE Steps model aimed to deliver parenting programs with proportionate delivery.
- This study investigated the fidelity, impact, and cost-effectiveness of the E-SEE Steps model.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the fidelity, impact, and cost-effectiveness of the E-SEE Steps parenting program.
- To assess the program's effect on child social-emotional wellbeing (ASQ:SE-2) and maternal depression (PHQ-9).
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual services.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial with an embedded economic and process evaluation was conducted.
- Parents were randomized with a 5:1 ratio to intervention or control groups.
- Effectiveness was analyzed using intention-to-treat, and cost-effectiveness using Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs).
Main Results:
- The target sample size was not achieved; 341 mothers were randomized.
- No significant differences were found between intervention and control groups for ASQ:SE-2 or PHQ-9 scores.
- The E-SEE Steps model incurred higher costs but showed borderline cost-effectiveness (ICER £20,062 per QALY).
Conclusions:
- The E-SEE Steps parenting program was not found to be effective in improving child social-emotional wellbeing or maternal depression.
- The program demonstrated borderline cost-effectiveness, suggesting potential value under certain conditions.
- Variable fidelity and low uptake of the Infant/Toddler programs necessitate modifications for future evaluations.
Background:
Evidence for parenting programs to improve wellbeing in children under three is inconclusive. We investigated the fidelity, impact, and cost-effectiveness of two parenting programs delivered within a longitudinal proportionate delivery model ('E-SEE Steps').
Methods:
Eligible parents with a child ≤ 8 weeks were recruited into a parallel two-arm, assessor blinded, randomized controlled, community-based, trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. Post-baseline randomization applied a 5:1 (intervention-to-control) ratio, stratified by primary (child social-emotional wellbeing (ASQ:SE-2)) and key secondary (maternal depression (PHQ-9)) outcome scores, sex, and site. All intervention parents received the Incredible Years® Baby Book (IY-B), and were offered the targeted Infant (IY-I)/Toddler (IY-T) program if eligible, based on ASQ:SE-2/PHQ-9 scores. Control families received usual services. Fidelity data were analysed descriptively. Primary analysis applied intention to treat. Effectiveness analysis fitted a marginal model to outcome scores. Cost-effectiveness analysis involved Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs).
Results:
The target sample (N = 606) was not achieved; 341 mothers were randomized (285:56), 322 (94%) were retained to study end. Of those eligible for the IY-I (n = 101), and IY-T (n = 101) programs, 51 and 21 respectively, attended. Eight (of 14) groups met the 80% self-reported fidelity criteria. No significant differences between arms were found for adjusted mean difference scores; ASQ:SE-2 (3.02, 95% CI: -0.03, 6.08, p = 0.052), PHQ-9 (-0.61; 95% CI: -1.34, 0.12, p = 0.1). E-SEE Steps had higher costs, but improved mothers' Health-related Quality of Life (0.031 Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gain), ICER of £20,062 per QALY compared to control. Serious adverse events (n = 86) were unrelated to the intervention.
Conclusions:
E-SEE Steps was not effective, but was borderline cost-effective. The model was delivered with varying fidelity, with lower-than-expected IY-T uptake. Changes to delivery systems and the individual programs may be needed prior to future evaluation.
Trial Registration:
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN11079129.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

