Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk
1School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, United States; University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, United States.
Abstract:
This paper demonstrates that the dissertation research of Ray-Chaudhuri (1939, 1944) that was used by Hermann Muller to support his radiation induced gene mutation hypothesis and linear non-threshold (LNT) dose response model during his Nobel Prize Lecture is "uninterpretable" with respect to these issues. The research failed to include essential research design information, resulting in reporting flaws that have never been previously identified. These observations are historically important because this dissertation was used to blunt powerful criticism of Muller's gene mutation research and strongly promoted his advocacy of the LNT model in radiation risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Longitudinal Research
Causality in Epidemiology

