Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.4K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.5K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.3K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

11
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
11
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same author

Within-alternative processing supports transitivity of preferences in multiattribute choice.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Escalating risk-taking is linked to emotional habituation.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Noradrenergic and Dopaminergic modulation of meta-cognition and meta-control.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

How human-AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Latent mechanisms of language disorganization relate to specific dimensions of psychopathology.

Nature. Mental health·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Evidence integration and decision confidence are modulated by stimulus consistency.

Moshe Glickman1,2, Rani Moran3,4, Marius Usher5,6

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK. mosheglickman345@gmail.com.

Nature Human Behaviour
|April 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method to track decision boundaries, supporting evidence integration over heuristics. A novel consistency bias was found, enhancing decision-making robustness despite appearing suboptimal.

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Decision Science
  • Computational Psychology

Background:

  • Evidence integration models decision-making with noisy data, but non-integration heuristics and elusive decision boundaries pose challenges.
  • Existing methods struggle to differentiate between integration and heuristic strategies in real-time decision processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a model-free method for extracting decision boundaries.
  • To provide empirical support for evidence integration over non-integration heuristics.
  • To identify and characterize biases in evidence integration, specifically a consistency bias.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced the 'decision classification boundary' (DCB) method, a model-free approach to identify choice boundaries based on accumulated evidence.
  • Applied the DCB method across four cross-domain experiments to analyze decision-making behavior.
  • Measured choice accuracy and decision confidence in response to varying stimulus consistency.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that decision boundaries can be effectively extracted using the DCB method.
  • Provided direct evidence supporting evidence integration over non-integration heuristics.
  • Identified a 'consistency bias' where incoming evidence is weighted based on its alignment with prior information.
  • Observed that this consistency bias enhances decision accuracy and confidence, particularly under noisy conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The DCB method offers a robust tool for investigating decision-making mechanisms and validating computational models.
  • Evidence integration is a key mechanism, modulated by a consistency bias that improves performance by increasing robustness to noise.
  • This consistency bias acts as a form of pre-decision confirmation bias, optimizing decision outcomes in complex environments.