Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Providers' accuracy in decision-making with assessing NYHA functional class of patients with heart failure after use
Kelly D Stamp1, Marilyn A Prasun2, Thomas P McCoy3
1Professor and Chair, Family and Community Nursing Department, Eloise R. Lewis Excellence Professor, UNC Greensboro, School of Nursing, 218 Moore Building, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170, United States; Carle BroMenn Medical Center Endowed Professor, Illinois State University, Mennonite College of Nursing, Normal, IL, United States.
Insights
The New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA-FC) Guide shows promise in improving the accuracy of heart failure classification. Heart failure specialists demonstrated higher accuracy than primary care providers when using the guide.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Accurate New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA-FC) is critical for effective guideline-directed heart failure (HF) care.
- Variability in NYHA-FC assignment can impact patient management and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity, reliability, and accuracy of the NYHA-FC Guide for assigning functional classification.
- To compare the performance of heart failure (HF) specialists and primary care (PC) providers in using the NYHA-FC Guide.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional, quasi-experimental design with validated vignettes was employed.
- Seventy-five healthcare providers (HF specialists and PC providers) used the NYHA-FC Guide to assign classifications.
- Known-group validity and interrater reliability analyses were conducted.
Main Results:
- HF providers achieved significantly higher accuracy scores (M=6.0) compared to PC providers (M=5.4; p=0.020).
- A majority of HF providers (62%) and PC providers (80%) reported the Guide aided in classifying heart failure.
Conclusions:
- The NYHA-FC Guide demonstrates potential for enhancing the accuracy of functional classification assignment.
- Further research comparing the Guide's accuracy to the six-minute walk test is recommended.
Background:
Correct assignment of New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA-FC) I-IV is essential in applying guideline directed care.
Objective:
Examine the validity, reliability, and accuracy of HF and primary care (PC) provider's assignment of NYHA-FC using the NYHA-FC Guide.
Methods:
Study utilized a cross-sectional, quasi-experimental known-groups design with validated vignettes. Providers (n = 75) used the Guide to assign NYHA-FC. Known-group validity comparisons (HF specialist/Non-HF specialist - PC provider) and interrater reliability were used to evaluate validity and reliability of the NYHA-FC Guide.
Results:
HF provider's accuracy total mean scores were significantly higher compared to PC (M = 6.0 vs. 5.4, p = 0.020). HF (62%) and PC providers (80%) reported that the Guide assisted them with deciding HF class.
Conclusion:
The NYHA-FC Guide showed promise for facilitating accuracy of assignment. Further research to evaluate the accuracy of using the NYHA-FC Guide compared to the gold standard six minute walk test is warranted.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care