Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Optimal Sequential Predictive Probability Designs for Early-Phase Oncology Expansion Cohorts.
Emily C Zabor1, Alexander M Kaizer2, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer3
1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences & Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
This study introduces a new sequential predictive probability design for phase I clinical trial expansion cohorts. This approach enhances efficiency and maintains statistical rigor, improving resource allocation in early-phase drug development.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial design
- Pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Traditional 3+3 dose-escalation designs are often unsuitable for targeted therapies.
- Phase I dose-expansion cohorts are crucial for safety and efficacy assessment but often lack rigorous design.
- Existing methods may not optimally balance resource preservation with statistical accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel approach for designing phase I dose-expansion cohorts using sequential predictive probability monitoring.
- To develop optimization criteria for early trial termination due to futility.
- To improve the efficiency and ethical considerations of early-phase clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Proposed two optimization criteria for trial design: one for efficiency and one for accuracy.
- Utilized sequential predictive probability monitoring for adaptive trial adjustments.
- Demonstrated the design's utility through simulation and a case study of atezolizumab in urothelial carcinoma.
Main Results:
- The sequential predictive probability design outperformed existing methods like Simon's two-stage designs.
- Achieved increased statistical power and significantly reduced average sample size under the null hypothesis.
- The optimal efficiency design demonstrated desirable properties for resource preservation while maintaining error rate control.
Conclusions:
- The proposed optimal efficiency design enables early halting of dose-expansion cohorts when efficacy is not promising, preserving resources.
- Maintains traditional control of type I and type II error rates.
- Offers a more ethical and resource-conscious approach to early-phase clinical trial design for targeted therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

