Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Revascularization Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Is
Doosup Shin1, Tae-Min Rhee2, Seung Hun Lee3
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) using angiography or fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance is superior to culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Angiography and FFR-guided CR show similar safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Complete revascularization (CR) benefits ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) over culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Optimal strategies for non-culprit PCI target selection in STEMI with MVD remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of different CR strategies in STEMI patients with MVD.
- To evaluate angiography-guided versus fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided CR using Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- Bayesian network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Comparison of culprit-only PCI, angiography-guided CR, and FFR-guided CR.
- Assessment of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and its components.
Main Results:
- Culprit-only PCI showed a higher risk of MACE compared to both angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR.
- No significant difference in MACE or its components between angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR.
- FFR-guided CR may use fewer stents than angiography-guided CR for intermediate lesions.
Conclusions:
- Both angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR are reasonable options for STEMI patients with MVD.
- FFR-guided CR is a reliable tool for intermediate or unclear lesions, potentially reducing stent usage.
- Further RCTs, like the FRAME-AMI trial, are needed for direct comparison.
Abstract:
Several studies have shown the benefit of complete revascularization (CR) over culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD). Nevertheless, optimal strategy to select targets for non-culprit PCI has not been clarified. In this paper, we critically discuss and compare the safety and efficacy of different strategies for CR in patients with STEMI and MVD using a Bayesian network meta-analysis including all previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In Bayesian network meta-analysis of 13 RCTs, culprit-only PCI was associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), compared with angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided CR strategies. However, there was no significant difference between angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR strategies in the risk of MACE and its individual components including all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization. These evidence support that both angiography-guided and FFR-guided complete revascularization strategies would be reasonable treatment option in patients with STEMI and MVD. If the non-culprit lesion is severe on visual assessment, angiography-guided PCI can be considered. If the non-culprit lesion is intermediate in severity or unclear based on visual assessment, FFR-guided strategy can be used as a reliable and objective tool, providing similar benefits with less stents compared with an angiography-guided strategy. Further RCT is needed to evaluate direct comparison between angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR strategies in patients with STEMI and MVD. Ongoing FRAME-AMI trial (NCT02715518) will provide more evidence regarding this issue.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:32Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management