Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart
Alexander C Egbe1, William R Miranda1, Patricia A Pellikka1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) affects 12% of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), particularly those with right-sided lesions. Cardiac therapies like guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and its treatment are well-documented in acquired heart disease, but less so in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD).
- Limited data exist on the prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of LVSD in adults with CHD.
- Understanding the impact of cardiac therapies on LVSD in this population is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of LVSD in adults with CHD.
- To identify risk factors associated with LVSD in adults with CHD.
- To evaluate the prognostic implications of LVSD and the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on LVSD in adults with CHD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of adults with CHD and systemic left ventricle (LV) from 2003 to 2019.
- LVSD defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <52% (men) or <54% (women).
- Cardiovascular events included heart failure hospitalization, heart transplant, or cardiovascular death.
Main Results:
- 12% (554/4,358) of adults with CHD had LVSD, with higher prevalence in right-sided lesions (15% vs 10%).
- LVSD was independently associated with cardiovascular events (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97).
- GDMT and CRT improved LVEF by 6% and 11%, respectively, and reduced N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide levels.
Conclusions:
- LVSD is prevalent in 12% of adults with CHD, more common in right-sided lesions, and linked to adverse cardiovascular events.
- GDMT and CRT demonstrate efficacy in improving LVEF in adults with CHD.
- These findings support further clinical trials to validate the benefits of these therapies in CHD patients.
Background:
Although the prevalence and prognostic implications of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), and the effect of cardiac therapies on LVSD are well described in patients with acquired heart disease, such data are sparse in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD).
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of LVSD, and the effect of cardiac therapies (guideline-directed medical therapy [GDMT] and cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT]) on LVSD in adults with CHD.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study of adults with CHD with systemic LV (2003-2019). LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <52%/<54% (men/women). Cardiovascular event was defined as heart failure hospitalization, heart transplant, and cardiovascular death.
Results:
Of 4,358 patients, 554 (12%) had LVSD, and the prevalence of LVSD was higher in right-sided lesions compared with left-sided lesions (15% vs 10%; P < 0.001). Cardiovascular events occurred in 312 (7%) patients. LVEF was independently associated with cardiovascular events (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; P = 0.009). Of 544 patients with LVSD, 311 received GDMT and 48 patients received CRT. LVEF increased by 6% (95% CI: 2%-10%) and 11% (95% CI: 8%-14%), and N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide decreased by 151 pg/mL (95% CI: 62-289 pg/mL) and 201 pg/mL (95% CI: 119-321 pg/mL) in patients who received GDMT and CRT, respectively.
Conclusions:
LVSD was present in 12% of adults with CHD, was more common in patients with right-sided lesions, and was associated with cardiovascular events. GDMT and CRT were associated with improvement in LVEF. These results provide a foundation for clinical trials to rigorously test the benefits of these therapies in CHD patients.
More Related Videos
08:21Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
09:40Induction of Right Ventricular Failure by Pulmonary Artery Constriction and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Mice
Published on: May 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care