Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads
Tessa A Harland1, Gregory Topp2, Kevin Shao2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Objectives:
Paddle leads for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offer more efficient energy delivery and advantages in some patients. However, there is concern for how safely SCS paddles can be replaced once previously implanted because of scar tissue and the relative vulnerability of the thoracic cord. In this study, we share our experience on SCS paddle replacement.
Materials And Methods:
Participants who underwent SCS replacement at Albany Medical Center between 2011 and 2020 were identified. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data and information regarding initial complications, reason for removal or revision, subsequent complications of replacement surgery and its timing, and whether the implant was ultimately removed. Percutaneous lead replacement cases performed over the same period were used as a comparison group.
Results:
A total of 1265 patients were identified to have had an SCS-related procedure based on billing codes. Of these, 73 involved replacement of epidural leads (51 paddles, 22 percutaneous). Most paddles (48/51) were replaced at the time of removal. A total of 30 of the 51 paddle replacements required additional lamina removal. Re-operations that occurred more than one year after initial implant were significantly more likely to require additional bone removal (p < 0.001). Paddle re-operations lasted in general 1.7 ± 0.2 hours and had 35 ± 5 mL of blood loss, whereas percutaneous operations lasted 1.3 ± 0.2 hours and had 12.5 ± 2 mL of blood loss. Despite the invasive nature of paddle replacement, there was no difference in complications (p = 0.23) compared with that in percutaneous leads.
Conclusions:
This study characterizes the safety profile of SCS paddle replacement surgeries. Here, we demonstrate that the replacement of paddle leads at the time of removal, with additional lamina removal if needed because of scar, is associated with low rates of complications. This validates the feasibility and low-risk profile of replacing paddle leads when clinically indicated for experienced surgeons with specialization in SCS.
