Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025
Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the geriatric research gap Delphi survey
Bellal Joseph1, Abdul Tawab Saljuqi, Jimmy Phuong
1From the Department of Surgery (B.J., A.T.S.), University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education (J.P., E.S.), The University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Coalition for National Trauma Research (M.A.B., P.J.B., M.A.P.), San Antonio, Texas; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine-Lehigh Valley Campus (R.D.B.), Allentown, Pennsylvania; Brigham & Women's Hospital (Z.C., M.J.), Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (W.L., E.B.), The Department of Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Division (S.L.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Anesthesiology (E.P.), UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, The Division of Trauma and Critical care (R.D.B.), Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine (USF-MCOM), Lehigh Valley Campus, Allentown, PA.
Background:
Treating older trauma patients requires a focus on the confluence of age-related physiological changes and the impact of the injury itself. Therefore, the primary way to improve the care of geriatric trauma patients is through the development of universal, systematic multidisciplinary research. To achieve this, the Coalition for National Trauma Research has developed the National Trauma Research Action Plan that has generated a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of geriatric trauma care from prehospital to rehabilitation.
Methods:
Experts in geriatric trauma care and research were recruited to identify current gaps in clinical geriatric research, generate research questions, and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines ensuring heterogeneity and generalizability. On subsequent surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a nine-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. The consensus was defined as more than 60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category.
Results:
A total of 24 subject matter experts generated questions in 109 key topic areas. After editing for duplication, 514 questions were included in the priority ranking. By round 3, 362 questions (70%) reached 60% consensus. Of these, 161 (44%) were high, 198 (55%) medium, and 3 (1%) low priority.
Conclusion:
Among the questions prioritized as high priority, questions related to three types of injuries (i.e., rib fracture, traumatic brain injury, and lower extremity injury) occurred with the greatest frequency. Among the 25 highest priority questions, the key topics with the highest frequency were pain management, frailty, and anticoagulation-related interventions. The most common types of research proposed were interventional clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies, outcome research, and health care systems research.
More Related Videos
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:27Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...