Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
National Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Program for Joint Replacement Surgery:
Emma L Heath1, Ilana Ackerman2, Michelle Lorimer1
1South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Developing an electronic system for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in joint replacement surgery is feasible and cost-effective, but requires resources and improved stakeholder engagement for national success.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Health Informatics
- Public Health
Background:
- Global push to collect joint replacement data beyond implants and revisions.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for patient-centered surgical outcomes.
- Electronic data collection and sharing of PROMs face financial and systemic barriers.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and implement an electronic PROMs data capture and reporting system for a national joint replacement registry.
- Identify and overcome barriers to the implementation and uptake of electronic PROMs.
- Provide a cost analysis for establishing and maintaining a nationwide electronic PROMs program.
Main Methods:
- Established governance committees to develop and implement a PROMs pilot program within a national registry (2018-2020).
- Collected preoperative and 6-month postoperative data electronically for hip, knee, or shoulder replacements across 44 Australian hospitals.
- Utilized a scalable online platform with features for multiple user access, patient registration, automated reminders, online consent, and real-time outcome dashboards.
Main Results:
- Registered 10,204 procedures (51.80% of total) during the pilot period.
- Achieved efficient patient registration (20-30 seconds) and data collection (10-12 minutes).
- Dashboard engagement varied by user group, with lower patient and surgeon uptake (12.9% and 45.3%, respectively).
- Established program cost estimated at Aus $7-15 per patient for two PROMs collections.
Conclusions:
- Successful national rollout of an orthopedic PROMs program requires substantial funding and staffing.
- Investment in PROMs collection and reporting can significantly improve healthcare processes.
- Enhancing stakeholder engagement, particularly among patients and surgeons, is vital for the long-term success of national PROMs initiatives.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
03:53Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024