Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

316
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
316
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

427
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
427
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

278
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
278
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

186
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
186
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.4K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.4K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

319
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
319

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of personalized biomedical risk assessment on smoking cessation counselling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BMC pulmonary medicine·2026
Same author

A mixture cure modeling framework for survival analysis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: implications for hospital resource management.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2026
Same author

Reply to Liu et al.: Beyond Frequency: Rethinking Exacerbation Risk in COPD.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Performance of multivariable risk prediction algorithms in predicting COPD exacerbations: a population-based study.

Thorax·2026
Same author

Oral anticoagulant switching in patients with atrial fibrillation: a long-term cohort study using population-level administrative data.

International journal of clinical pharmacy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Marginal Versus Conditional Odds Ratios When Updating Risk Prediction Models.

Mohsen Sadatsafavi1, Hamid Tavakoli1, Abdollah Safari1,2

  • 1From the Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|April 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Updating risk prediction models requires careful adjustment for new settings. A simpler odds ratio method is less accurate than logistic regression when individual data is available, but an approximate method can improve accuracy when data is limited.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Risk prediction models require recalibration for new populations to maintain accuracy.
  • Fixed odds ratio transformation is a common, though sometimes imprecise, updating method.
  • Accurate model updating is crucial for reliable clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of a simpler odds ratio updating method compared to logistic regression.
  • To propose and assess an alternative method for updating risk models when individual data is unavailable.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of a simplified prevalence-based odds ratio calculation against a gold-standard logistic regression approach.
  • Development and evaluation of an approximate method using predicted risk variance for updating models without individual-level data.

Main Results:

  • The simpler prevalence-based odds ratio method systematically underestimates the true conditional odds ratio, leading to undercorrection.
  • The proposed approximate method effectively recovers the conditional odds ratio, significantly reducing undercorrection.
  • Simulations and examples demonstrate the practical benefits of the new approach.

Conclusions:

  • The simpler odds ratio updating method should be avoided when individual data is accessible.
  • The proposed approximate method offers a valuable alternative for updating risk models in data-limited settings.
  • Improved risk model updating enhances the reliability and applicability of predictions across diverse populations.