Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025
Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Evaluating Potential Autologous Bypass Grafts with Tomographic Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Compared with Standard
Steven Rogers1, Joao Carreira2, Alison Phairv3
1Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK; Independent Vascular Services Ltd, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
Background:
Vein mapping using duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a routine in selecting optimal autologous bypass grafts (aBG) but is time consuming and operator-dependent. Tomographic three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (tUS), using free-hand electromagnetic tracking, allows cardiac and vascular surgeons to view 3D images of the entire length of the potential bypass graft. This study compares tUS with DUS in the evaluation of potential autologous grafts for coronary and lower limb bypass.
Methods:
Both DUS and tUS imaging of 434 potential autologous grafts (364 long, 22 short saphenous veins, and 48 radial artery) immediately before bypass surgery were compared. The time in minutes to evaluate each aBG was recorded. Surgeons scored the quality of the aBG at operation. A score of 5 was in complete agreement with preoperative imaging with scores of 4 considered "good".
Results:
Most operating surgeons (113, 57%) preferred interpreting the tUS images and felt that this technology could replace DUS completely. The choice of aBG would have been changed as a result of tUS images in 64 (32%) cases. DUS imaging took a mean (+/-sd) of 08:26 ± 04:44 minutes compared with only 01:00 ± 00:25 minutes for tUS (P < 0.001). However, processing the tUS images, which is currently done manually by the vascular scientist, took significantly longer at 19:31 ± 12:41 minutes compared with 09:03 ± 09:12 minutes for reporting DUS (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Surgeons preferred to see tUS images of the potential aBG themselves rather than relying on DUS reports. tUS images were significantly quicker than DUS to acquire but needed more processing time.
More Related Videos
13:16Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021