Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Machine learned calibrations to high-throughput molecular excited state calculations
Shomik Verma1, Miguel Rivera2, David O Scanlon3
1Department of Materials, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Machine learning calibrates computational screening methods for excited state properties. This accelerates molecular discovery by improving accuracy and reducing errors in high-throughput virtual screening for photochemical applications.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Photochemistry
- Machine learning
Background:
- Understanding molecular excited state properties is crucial for designing light-interacting compounds.
- Experimental methods for chemical discovery are time- and resource-intensive.
- High-throughput virtual screening (HTVS) uses computational chemistry to screen large databases, but initial low-accuracy methods can lead to high false positive/negative rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To calibrate a high-throughput computational method (xTB-sTDA) against a higher accuracy method (TD-DFT) using machine learning.
- To reduce errors in HTVS for excited state property prediction.
- To enable cost-effective and accurate large-scale excited state screening for accelerated molecular discovery.
Main Methods:
- Machine learning (ML) was employed to calibrate the eXtended Tight Binding based simplified Tamm-Dancoff approximation (xTB-sTDA) against time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT).
- The calibrated model was tested for in-domain and out-of-domain accuracy.
- The ML-calibrated model was applied to screen a 250,000-molecule database and validated by calibrating against a higher-level method (CC2).
Main Results:
- The ML calibration achieved an approximately sixfold decrease in in-domain error and a threefold decrease in out-of-domain error.
- The resulting mean absolute error of ~0.14 eV is competitive with existing ML calibrations and superior to linear calibration of xTB-sTDA.
- Application to a large database revealed inaccuracies of xTB-sTDA across chemical space, and the workflow demonstrated generalizability with CC2 calibration.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning provides a cost-effective and accurate approach for large-scale excited state screening.
- This ML-driven calibration enhances the reliability of HTVS, reducing false positives/negatives.
- The developed workflow accelerates molecular discovery for photochemical applications and other disciplines reliant on excited state properties.
More Related Videos
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
08:22Calibration-free In Vitro Quantification of Protein Homo-oligomerization Using Commercial Instrumentation and Free, Open Source Brightness Analysis Software
Published on: July 17, 2018
Related Concept Videos
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Calorimetry
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes