Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

265
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
265
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.4K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.4K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand and the treatment of long-term conditions: a narrative literature review about Pacific people's understandings of health and wellbeing.

Journal of primary health care·2025
Same author

Censorship or inclusion?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

COVID-19 from Wellington New Zealand.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2020
Same author

When shared decision-making and evidence based practice clash: Infant sleep practices.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2019
Same author

Culture, cultural competence and the cross-cultural consultation.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2017
Same author

How Should We Respond to Non-Dominant Healing Practices, the Example of Homeopathy.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2016
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K

Capacity and decision making.

Ben Gray1

  • 1Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand ben.gray@otago.ac.nz.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|April 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient autonomy in healthcare decisions should be balanced with broader quality considerations. This approach ensures decisions benefit patients, resources, public health, and clinicians, not just individual choice.

Keywords:
CapacityInformed ConsentQuality of Health Care

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Healthcare Quality
  • Decision-Making Theory

Background:

  • Current discourse on decision-making capacity often prioritizes individual autonomy.
  • The impact of patient decisions on other stakeholders and healthcare systems is frequently overlooked.
  • Pickering et al. propose decision-maker capacity as the sole criterion for decision validity, excluding risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the notion that patient autonomy is the sole determinant in clinical decision-making.
  • To advocate for a framework that integrates broader quality of healthcare parameters into patient decisions.
  • To highlight the ethical and practical implications of decisions affecting multiple parties in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Critically analyzing the arguments presented by Pickering et al. regarding decision-making capacity.
  • Developing a counter-argument grounded in the principles of healthcare quality.
  • Proposing a multi-parameter framework for evaluating clinical decisions.

Main Results:

  • Patient autonomy is not the exclusive factor in determining the validity of clinical decisions, especially when others are affected.
  • A sole focus on decision-maker capacity neglects the potential negative consequences of unwise choices.
  • The proposed framework incorporates patient experience, resource utilization, public health impact, and clinician experience.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical decisions, particularly in healthcare, require a balanced approach beyond individual autonomy.
  • Integrating a quality of healthcare lens ensures decisions are ethically sound and practically viable.
  • This multi-faceted evaluation promotes better outcomes for patients, healthcare systems, and society.