Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proteomics01:33

Proteomics

8.2K
A proteome is the entire set of proteins that a cell type produces. We can study proteomes using the knowledge of genomes because genes code for mRNAs, and the mRNAs encode proteins. Although mRNA analysis is a step in the right direction, not all mRNAs are translated into proteins.
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proteomic analysis of dental enamel from 20 Homo naledi individuals shows no male markers.

Cell·2026
Same author

Navigating luminal heterogeneity: etiology-based proteogenomic subtyping for targeted treatment strategies in breast cancer.

Molecular cancer·2026
Same author

Improved Peptide Search for Identification of SUMO and Sequence-Based Modifiers, in MaxSBM.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same author

Epigenetic reprogramming of T cell metabolism restores function and enhances anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer.

Nature immunology·2026
Same author

Bimodal Peptide Collision Cross Section Distribution Reflects Two Stable Conformations in the Gas Phase.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Response to commentary on "Paracentesis exceeding three liters increases risks of acute kidney injury even in cirrhotic patients with albumin infused refractory ascites".

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.1K

Benchmarking differential expression, imputation and quantification methods for proteomics data.

Miao-Hsia Lin1, Pei-Shan Wu2, Tzu-Hsuan Wong1

  • 1Graduate Institute and Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.1 Jen Ai road section 1 Taipei 100 Taiwan.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|April 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study benchmarks computational tools for quantitative proteomics, finding RNA-sequencing-based differential expression (DE) analysis methods offer higher accuracy for identifying differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). These findings guide the selection of optimal analysis strategies.

Keywords:
benchmark datadifferential expressionimputationmatching between runsproteomics

More Related Videos

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions
09:00

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions

Published on: April 18, 2025

861
Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease
08:11

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease

Published on: December 28, 2012

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.1K
A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions
09:00

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions

Published on: April 18, 2025

861
Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease
08:11

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease

Published on: December 28, 2012

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Quantitative proteomics relies heavily on computational tools for data analysis, including protein quantification, imputation, and differential expression (DE) analysis.
  • The development of numerous analysis tools over the past decade highlights the ongoing search for optimal methods.
  • The increasing availability of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technology has led to the creation of many DE analysis methods, raising questions about their applicability to proteomics data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark various computational tools for quantitative proteomics data analysis.
  • To compare the performance of microarray- and RNA-seq-based differential expression analysis tools, imputation algorithms, and protein quantification methods.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting appropriate analysis methods for quantitative proteomics datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Generation of a custom proteomics dataset using proteins from humans, yeast, and Drosophila in defined ratios.
  • Benchmarking of differential expression analysis tools, including those originally developed for microarray and RNA-seq data.
  • Evaluation of imputation algorithms and protein quantification methods using the generated and public datasets.
  • Integration of all evaluated methods into the Perseus software (version 2.0.3.0).

Main Results:

  • RNA-seq-based differential expression tools demonstrated higher accuracy (ACC) in identifying differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) when applied to proteomics data.
  • The study provides a comparative analysis of various computational approaches for quantitative proteomics.
  • The findings are applicable to both custom-generated and publicly available proteomics datasets.

Conclusions:

  • RNA-seq-based differential expression analysis tools show superior performance for identifying DEPs in quantitative proteomics.
  • This research offers valuable guidance for researchers in selecting and applying appropriate computational tools for proteomics data analysis.
  • The integrated Perseus software provides a practical resource for implementing these validated methods.