Machine learning-based screening of the diagnostic genes and their relationship with immune-cell infiltration in patients with lung adenocarcinoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025
MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017
Shuying Wang1,2, Qiong Wang3, Bin Fan2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Background:
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of lung cancer, and has a dismal mortality rate of 80%, mainly due to diagnosis at an advanced stage. Biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity for the early diagnosis of LUAD are sparse. This study aimed to identify markers for the early diagnosis of LUAD.
Methods:
The GSE32863 and GSE75037 data sets were standardized and merged to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were conducted. The intersected DEGs from the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine (SVM) regression analyses were considered the hub genes. Then the diagnostic ability and expression of hub genes was tested in GSE63459 data set, Finally, CIBERSORT was used to analyze the correlation between the immune-infiltrating cells and hub genes.
Results:
The following 7 DEGs were intersected by the LASSO and SVM regression analyses: Locus 401286 (LOC401286), flavin-containing monooxygenase 2 (FMO2), XLKD1, Ras homolog family member J (RHOJ), scavenger receptor Class A member 5 (SCARA5), heat shock protein beta-2 (HSPB2), and serine incorporator 2 (SERINC2). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of LOC401286, FMO2, XLKD1, RHOJ, SCARA5, HSPB2, and SERINC2 was 0.99, 1.00, 0.99, 1.00, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98, respectively in the training groups. The AUC of LOC401286, FMO2, XLKD1, RHOJ, SCARA5, HSPB2, and SERINC2 was 0.97, 0.96, 0.94, 0.88, 0.85, 0.94 and 0.89, respectively in the validation group. The immune-cell infiltrations of naive B cells, memory B cells, plasma cells, naive cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 T cells, T follicular helper cells, regulatory T cells, gamma delta T cells, monocytes, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, resting mast cells, activated mast cells, and neutrophils were different between the normal and tumor tissues. Notably, these immune cells were correlated with the above-mentioned 7 diagnostic genes.
Conclusions:
We identified 7 DEGs in LUAD tissue that can be considered diagnostic genes based on 2 machine-learning regression methods, which could be very helpful for the early diagnosis of LUAD in clinical practice.
