Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
Published on: December 9, 2010
Clinical application of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE in prostate MRI at
Tsutomu Tamada1, Yu Ueda2, Ayumu Kido3
1Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan. ttamada@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp.
Objectives:
Image quality (IQ) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in high b-value acquisitions. Compressed SENSE (C-SENSE), which combines SENSE with compressed sensing, enables SNR to be improved by reducing noise. The aim of this study was to compare IQ and prostate cancer (PC) detectability between DWI with ssEPI using SENSE (EPIS) and using C-SENSE (EPICS).
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-five patients with pathologically proven PC underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. DW images acquired with EPIS and EPICS were assessed for the following: lesion conspicuity (LC), SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean and standard deviation (SD) of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of lesion (lADCm and lADCsd), coefficient of variation of lesion ADC (lADCcv), and mean ADC of benign prostate (bADCm).
Results:
LC were comparable between EPIS and EPICS (p > 0.050), and SNR and CNR were significantly higher in EPICS than EPIS (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). In both EPIS and EPICS, lADCm was significantly lower than bADCm (p < 0.001). In addition, lADCcv was significantly lower in EPICS than in EPIS (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Compared with EPIS, EPICS has improved IQ and comparable diagnostic performance in PC.
More Related Videos
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging